The article describes various models of training mediators for the education system in the Russia... more The article describes various models of training mediators for the education system in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan. A comparative analysis of the mediation services development in Siberia and Kazakhstan for the possibilities and prospects of cooperation and interaction is carried out. The article presents specific features of the model for training intercultural mediators for resolving interethnic conflicts in the Krasnoyarsk Krai. This model meets the needs of multinational Siberian society and is aimed at solving regional problems in the education system. A peculiar characteristic of the model for the Krasnoyarsk Krai is its multi-level nature, openness and continuity of preparation, with the inclusion of formal and non-formal education elements. Interdisciplinary nature of interaction of the network partners involved in the training and retraining of mediators for the education system gives an opportunity to use the potential and resources of professional mediators and
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), including partnering, dispute review boards, mediation and ... more Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), including partnering, dispute review boards, mediation and arbitration, have become the primary ways of settling construction disputes in the United States. This article describes why mediation is used to resolve disputes and describes what the mediation process looks like. Mediation procedures and techniques may be quite different depending upon the style of the mediator (facilitative or evaluative) and the type of dispute (community or construction) being mediated. An evaluative style of mediation is used for construction disputes in the United States. The article discusses what mediation users want from mediators, the phases of development of ADR in the United States, as well as the costs of mediation. An appendix describes a model of mediation used for community disputes which can become the basis for understanding the evaluative approach to mediation used in construction disputes.
of the Judiciary's computer division assisted in collecting data. Importantly, Andrew Ovenden who... more of the Judiciary's computer division assisted in collecting data. Importantly, Andrew Ovenden who recently graduated with a Ph.D. in Sociology processed the data. Justice Frank Padgett reviewed earlier drafts and gave us valuable guidance in the analysis of the data. Matthew Moneyhon also reviewed drafts and helped rewrite them. Many law students and Center volunteers contributed time to the project, including
Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. R... more Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Recommended Citation
PEPPERDINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION LAW JOURNAL resolution 2 by: 1) specifically reviewing the cultural... more PEPPERDINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION LAW JOURNAL resolution 2 by: 1) specifically reviewing the cultural theories of Edward T. Hall, Geert Hofstede, Fons Trompenaars and Charles M. Hampden-Turner, and Richard D. Lewis, 1 3 2) considering country specific anecdotal accounts of national negotiating behaviors, and 3) reviewing some specific beliefs, behaviors, and practices that impact national negotiation styles and approaches. This article will focus mainly on cross-cultural differences between American and Asian negotiation styles and behaviors. 14 VARIETIES OF CROSS-CULTURAL DIFFERENCES The literature about cross-cultural differences is both general and specific. 15 The general culture literature includes characteristics that vary 12.
Court-annexed arbitration, one of the most popular alternative dispute resolution innovations,' i... more Court-annexed arbitration, one of the most popular alternative dispute resolution innovations,' is being used to combat the two most prevalent criticisms of the American civil justice system: 2 delay and high litigation costs. 3 Although arbitration programs are currently operating in at least twenty states and ten United States federal dist The evaluation of Hawaii's Court-Annexed Arbitration Program was funded by the judiciary of the State of Hawaii and the Program on Conflict Resolution at the University of Hawaii at Manoa.
... CONCLUSION The final answer is that there is no clear "best" ADR method to use in c... more ... CONCLUSION The final answer is that there is no clear "best" ADR method to use in constructiondisputes. Partnering works well to prevent disputes, and Dispute Review Boards, Mediation, and Arbitration have all proved very successful for resolving disputes. ...
The article describes various models of training mediators for the education system in the Russia... more The article describes various models of training mediators for the education system in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan. A comparative analysis of the mediation services development in Siberia and Kazakhstan for the possibilities and prospects of cooperation and interaction is carried out. The article presents specific features of the model for training intercultural mediators for resolving interethnic conflicts in the Krasnoyarsk Krai. This model meets the needs of multinational Siberian society and is aimed at solving regional problems in the education system. A peculiar characteristic of the model for the Krasnoyarsk Krai is its multi-level nature, openness and continuity of preparation, with the inclusion of formal and non-formal education elements. Interdisciplinary nature of interaction of the network partners involved in the training and retraining of mediators for the education system gives an opportunity to use the potential and resources of professional mediators and
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), including partnering, dispute review boards, mediation and ... more Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), including partnering, dispute review boards, mediation and arbitration, have become the primary ways of settling construction disputes in the United States. This article describes why mediation is used to resolve disputes and describes what the mediation process looks like. Mediation procedures and techniques may be quite different depending upon the style of the mediator (facilitative or evaluative) and the type of dispute (community or construction) being mediated. An evaluative style of mediation is used for construction disputes in the United States. The article discusses what mediation users want from mediators, the phases of development of ADR in the United States, as well as the costs of mediation. An appendix describes a model of mediation used for community disputes which can become the basis for understanding the evaluative approach to mediation used in construction disputes.
of the Judiciary's computer division assisted in collecting data. Importantly, Andrew Ovenden who... more of the Judiciary's computer division assisted in collecting data. Importantly, Andrew Ovenden who recently graduated with a Ph.D. in Sociology processed the data. Justice Frank Padgett reviewed earlier drafts and gave us valuable guidance in the analysis of the data. Matthew Moneyhon also reviewed drafts and helped rewrite them. Many law students and Center volunteers contributed time to the project, including
Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. R... more Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Recommended Citation
PEPPERDINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION LAW JOURNAL resolution 2 by: 1) specifically reviewing the cultural... more PEPPERDINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION LAW JOURNAL resolution 2 by: 1) specifically reviewing the cultural theories of Edward T. Hall, Geert Hofstede, Fons Trompenaars and Charles M. Hampden-Turner, and Richard D. Lewis, 1 3 2) considering country specific anecdotal accounts of national negotiating behaviors, and 3) reviewing some specific beliefs, behaviors, and practices that impact national negotiation styles and approaches. This article will focus mainly on cross-cultural differences between American and Asian negotiation styles and behaviors. 14 VARIETIES OF CROSS-CULTURAL DIFFERENCES The literature about cross-cultural differences is both general and specific. 15 The general culture literature includes characteristics that vary 12.
Court-annexed arbitration, one of the most popular alternative dispute resolution innovations,' i... more Court-annexed arbitration, one of the most popular alternative dispute resolution innovations,' is being used to combat the two most prevalent criticisms of the American civil justice system: 2 delay and high litigation costs. 3 Although arbitration programs are currently operating in at least twenty states and ten United States federal dist The evaluation of Hawaii's Court-Annexed Arbitration Program was funded by the judiciary of the State of Hawaii and the Program on Conflict Resolution at the University of Hawaii at Manoa.
... CONCLUSION The final answer is that there is no clear "best" ADR method to use in c... more ... CONCLUSION The final answer is that there is no clear "best" ADR method to use in constructiondisputes. Partnering works well to prevent disputes, and Dispute Review Boards, Mediation, and Arbitration have all proved very successful for resolving disputes. ...
Uploads
Papers by John Barkai