
Joakim Gundel
Address: Kenya
less
Related Authors
Muqtedar Khan
University of Delaware
Andreas Umland
National University of "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy"
Edith Szanto
University of Alabama - Tuscaloosa
Cristiana Facchini
Università di Bologna
Remo Caponi
University of Cologne
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Martin O'Neill
University of York
Vera Shevzov
Smith College
Noe Cornago
University of the Basque Country, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
Michaela Valente
Università degli Studi "La Sapienza" di Roma
InterestsView All (15)
Uploads
Papers by Joakim Gundel
Reconciliation has persistently been omitted from past peace processes, and has essentially been replaced by power-sharing arrangements, neglecting the interests and grievances of the Somali population. The continuance of violence in Somalia’s regions and within the capital itself, shows that there is a serious need for reconciliation. Violence is by no means only a reflection of the conflict with Al-Shabaab and the manifestation of terrorism. It also reflects grievances and feuds that have a long history and still need to be resolved.
While a solution to the political crisis in Somalia requires changes to the constitution, achieving this cannot be done solely on the basis of technocratic inputs. A new constitution must reflect the outcomes and agreements made through a broad reconciliation process. Without bringing the population firmly behind the national security plan, it will be very difficult to defeat Al-Shabaab as well as to generate sufficient security.
The first step in a reconciliation process would be to bring Somalis together to determine the way in which key issues are addressed, which is likely to involve forgiveness or truth and justice. Beyond this, the agenda of the reconciliation process can be derived from bottom-up, participatory action research (PAR) methodologies in order to identify grievances and the principles for their resolution.
The overall recommendation is that the UN and international community support Somalia in finally launching a truth and reconciliation process. It should be driven by Somalis themselves, preferably through an independent facilitation committee composed of eminent elders, cultural personalities and academics without vested political interests in the process. This facilitation committee could then be coupled with “The Elders” founded by Nelson Mandela, to provide guidance and international connections. It is recommended that the reconciliation process is established from the ground up, starting at the district level, continuing at the regional level, to be finalised at the national level.
This report is not, and does not purport to be fully exhaustive with regard to the issues covered, nor is it conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. The views and opinions stated in this report do not represent an opinion of ACCORD. ACCORD, however, holds responsibility for style and form of the report.
Reconciliation has persistently been omitted from past peace processes, and has essentially been replaced by power-sharing arrangements, neglecting the interests and grievances of the Somali population. The continuance of violence in Somalia’s regions and within the capital itself, shows that there is a serious need for reconciliation. Violence is by no means only a reflection of the conflict with Al-Shabaab and the manifestation of terrorism. It also reflects grievances and feuds that have a long history and still need to be resolved.
While a solution to the political crisis in Somalia requires changes to the constitution, achieving this cannot be done solely on the basis of technocratic inputs. A new constitution must reflect the outcomes and agreements made through a broad reconciliation process. Without bringing the population firmly behind the national security plan, it will be very difficult to defeat Al-Shabaab as well as to generate sufficient security.
The first step in a reconciliation process would be to bring Somalis together to determine the way in which key issues are addressed, which is likely to involve forgiveness or truth and justice. Beyond this, the agenda of the reconciliation process can be derived from bottom-up, participatory action research (PAR) methodologies in order to identify grievances and the principles for their resolution.
The overall recommendation is that the UN and international community support Somalia in finally launching a truth and reconciliation process. It should be driven by Somalis themselves, preferably through an independent facilitation committee composed of eminent elders, cultural personalities and academics without vested political interests in the process. This facilitation committee could then be coupled with “The Elders” founded by Nelson Mandela, to provide guidance and international connections. It is recommended that the reconciliation process is established from the ground up, starting at the district level, continuing at the regional level, to be finalised at the national level.
This report is not, and does not purport to be fully exhaustive with regard to the issues covered, nor is it conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. The views and opinions stated in this report do not represent an opinion of ACCORD. ACCORD, however, holds responsibility for style and form of the report.
findings on past and present language and perceptions of accountability in Somali culture, which may
prove useful in nurturing a new understanding of accountability in Somalia. The paper then briefly
summarises the post-colonial experience in Somalia in terms of the systems and institutions of
accountability, how they functioned, and the key issues surrounding accountability. It also explores the
genesis of the collapse of trust in public institutions that occurred when the state disintegrated after the
outbreak of civil war. In addition, the paper explores how this collapse in trust led to a blurred notion of
the separation between the private and public (state) realms, and the implications thereof.
The paper also provides a brief overview of recent approaches to fostering accountability, including a
brief account of the history of international agendas and efforts related to accountability in Somalia since
the 2010 Madrid Conference. This is done in order to provide an understanding of the roles and impact
of international aid on the culture of accountability in Somalia, together with the current “gatekeeper”
phenomenon and corruption-security nexus.
Finally, the paper provides a brief descriptive mapping of the landscape of accountability and corruption
issues in Somalia, as well as the complex networks of interests and dynamics involved, in order to illustrate
how the unique genealogy of accountability continues to influence the character and culture of
accountability in Somalia.