Weaver, who kindly reviewed draft manuscripts and who offered challenging comments and observatio... more Weaver, who kindly reviewed draft manuscripts and who offered challenging comments and observations and to Irma Haardt who deciphered his chicken scratches to type this Article.
Weaver, who kindly reviewed draft manuscripts and who offered challenging comments and observatio... more Weaver, who kindly reviewed draft manuscripts and who offered challenging comments and observations and to Irma Haardt who deciphered his chicken scratches to type this Article.
School of Law. The author is the President of the Board of Directors of the San Diego Foundation ... more School of Law. The author is the President of the Board of Directors of the San Diego Foundation for Change, and a partner in the law firm of Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, LLP. This article is based on research connected with amicus curiae briefs prepared by the author for filing on behalf of Unitarian Universalist amici in two cases, Barnes-Wallace v. BSA, 9th Cir. Nos. 04-55732 & 04-56167, and Winkler v. Rumsfeld, 7th Cir. No. 05-3451. The Barnes-Wallace brief was filed in the Ninth Circuit on behalf of the Social Justice Committee and Board of Trustees of the
the date of purchase was inflated because of the misrepresentation."). Powerful arguments have be... more the date of purchase was inflated because of the misrepresentation."). Powerful arguments have been framed in favor of the Ninth Circuit's approach. See generally Merritt B. Fox, Demystifying Causation in Fraud-on-the-Market Actions, 60 Bus. LAW. 507 (2005) ("Because of this fundamental difference in causal connection, the twin concepts of transaction causation and loss causation simply do not make sense in fraud-on-the-market actions.");
Weaver, who kindly reviewed draft manuscripts and who offered challenging comments and observatio... more Weaver, who kindly reviewed draft manuscripts and who offered challenging comments and observations and to Irma Haardt who deciphered his chicken scratches to type this Article.
Weaver, who kindly reviewed draft manuscripts and who offered challenging comments and observatio... more Weaver, who kindly reviewed draft manuscripts and who offered challenging comments and observations and to Irma Haardt who deciphered his chicken scratches to type this Article.
School of Law. The author is the President of the Board of Directors of the San Diego Foundation ... more School of Law. The author is the President of the Board of Directors of the San Diego Foundation for Change, and a partner in the law firm of Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, LLP. This article is based on research connected with amicus curiae briefs prepared by the author for filing on behalf of Unitarian Universalist amici in two cases, Barnes-Wallace v. BSA, 9th Cir. Nos. 04-55732 & 04-56167, and Winkler v. Rumsfeld, 7th Cir. No. 05-3451. The Barnes-Wallace brief was filed in the Ninth Circuit on behalf of the Social Justice Committee and Board of Trustees of the
the date of purchase was inflated because of the misrepresentation."). Powerful arguments have be... more the date of purchase was inflated because of the misrepresentation."). Powerful arguments have been framed in favor of the Ninth Circuit's approach. See generally Merritt B. Fox, Demystifying Causation in Fraud-on-the-Market Actions, 60 Bus. LAW. 507 (2005) ("Because of this fundamental difference in causal connection, the twin concepts of transaction causation and loss causation simply do not make sense in fraud-on-the-market actions.");
Uploads
Papers by Eric Isaacson