
Emma Colven
Related Authors
Sara Meerow
Arizona State University
Kevin Grove
Florida International University
Sylvia Croese
University of California, Irvine
Stephanie Wakefield
Life University
Sebastian Fastenrath
University of Melbourne
Joshua Newell
University of Michigan
Gina Ziervogel
University of Cape Town
Uploads
Papers by Emma Colven
agenda, is being rolled out from the top down by a network of
public, private, non-profit sector actors forming a global urban
resilience complex: producing norms that circulate globally, creating
assessment tools rendering urban resilience technical and
managerial, and commodifying urban resilience such that private
sector involvement becomes integral to urban development planning
and governance. The Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilience
Cities Program is at the center of this complex, working with the
World Bank, global consultants, NGOs, and private sector service
providers to enroll cities, develop and circulate urban resilience
assessment tools, and create a market catalyzed by the notion of a
resilience dividend. Notwithstanding the claim of this program
being open and inclusive, aspects of its initial operationalization
in Jakarta suggest that urban resilience assessment tools preempt
alternative understandings of urban resilience and marginalizing
voices of the city's most vulnerable populations.
agenda, is being rolled out from the top down by a network of
public, private, non-profit sector actors forming a global urban
resilience complex: producing norms that circulate globally, creating
assessment tools rendering urban resilience technical and
managerial, and commodifying urban resilience such that private
sector involvement becomes integral to urban development planning
and governance. The Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilience
Cities Program is at the center of this complex, working with the
World Bank, global consultants, NGOs, and private sector service
providers to enroll cities, develop and circulate urban resilience
assessment tools, and create a market catalyzed by the notion of a
resilience dividend. Notwithstanding the claim of this program
being open and inclusive, aspects of its initial operationalization
in Jakarta suggest that urban resilience assessment tools preempt
alternative understandings of urban resilience and marginalizing
voices of the city's most vulnerable populations.