improved by 63%, 49.6%, 4.2% and 27.3% respectively. In the non-affected limb, HY ratings changed... more improved by 63%, 49.6%, 4.2% and 27.3% respectively. In the non-affected limb, HY ratings changed by 18.9% from 8.8 prior the first tDCS session to 7.14 after the 5th session of the first block. During following four blocks, HY ratings in the non-affected limb were as follows: decreased by 66%, increased by 13% (worsening), decreased by 31.1%, and 39.9% respectively. AL improved only after the 4th and 5th block, by 54.2% and 40.2% (from 7.2 to 3.3 and from16.7 to 10.0) respectively in the affected limb and by 63.9% and 27.2% in the contralateral limb. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this the first study assessing hyperalgesia and allodynia in a patient receiving tDCS treatment.
improved by 63%, 49.6%, 4.2% and 27.3% respectively. In the non-affected limb, HY ratings changed... more improved by 63%, 49.6%, 4.2% and 27.3% respectively. In the non-affected limb, HY ratings changed by 18.9% from 8.8 prior the first tDCS session to 7.14 after the 5th session of the first block. During following four blocks, HY ratings in the non-affected limb were as follows: decreased by 66%, increased by 13% (worsening), decreased by 31.1%, and 39.9% respectively. AL improved only after the 4th and 5th block, by 54.2% and 40.2% (from 7.2 to 3.3 and from16.7 to 10.0) respectively in the affected limb and by 63.9% and 27.2% in the contralateral limb. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this the first study assessing hyperalgesia and allodynia in a patient receiving tDCS treatment.
Uploads
Papers by EL ATAR