
Dirk Tröndle
Related Authors
Muqtedar Khan
University of Delaware
Noe Cornago
University of the Basque Country, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
Oliver Reisner
Ilia State University
Francesca Gazzano
University of Genova
Serkan Cura
Celal Bayar University
Vittorio Springfield Tomelleri
Università degli Studi di Torino
Doç. Dr. Gülsün Nakıboğlu
Istanbul Technical University
İdiris Demirel
Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniv
Rodrigo G de Azevedo
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Zoltan Bartha
Miskolc University
Uploads
Papers by Dirk Tröndle
of the 1980s and increasingly over the past 20 years, often without any further definition.
Authors and opinion leaders use the term to describe Turkey’s pro-active foreign policy in
neighbouring regions that had been under the influence of the Ottoman Empire. However,
the term is misleading because it implies the continuation of a policy under different auspices,
which can neither be derived from Ottoman history nor traced back to Ottomanism
as one central political thought in late Ottoman mentality history. Protagonists of Turkish
foreign policy also reject the term. Critics use it as a fighting term and object, among other
things, to Turkey’s foreign policy shift away from the West to the East and its Islamist character.
The term has thus become part of the “culture clash” that continues to be fought
between
the conservative-Islamic and secular camps even in the post-Kemalist era.
Books by Dirk Tröndle
of the 1980s and increasingly over the past 20 years, often without any further definition.
Authors and opinion leaders use the term to describe Turkey’s pro-active foreign policy in
neighbouring regions that had been under the influence of the Ottoman Empire. However,
the term is misleading because it implies the continuation of a policy under different auspices,
which can neither be derived from Ottoman history nor traced back to Ottomanism
as one central political thought in late Ottoman mentality history. Protagonists of Turkish
foreign policy also reject the term. Critics use it as a fighting term and object, among other
things, to Turkey’s foreign policy shift away from the West to the East and its Islamist character.
The term has thus become part of the “culture clash” that continues to be fought
between
the conservative-Islamic and secular camps even in the post-Kemalist era.