INTRODUCTION/ABSTRACT
This is a comprehensive coverage of various forms of logic, which is caref... more INTRODUCTION/ABSTRACT This is a comprehensive coverage of various forms of logic, which is carefully explained so that the reader(s) will be able to deal with everyday syllogisms and their use and frequent misuse. Syllogisms occur in everyday conversations, often without realisation by the speaker(s) and/or listener(s).
INTRODUCTION/PREAMBLE
There are 5 main categories and many sub-categories, however many ... more INTRODUCTION/PREAMBLE There are 5 main categories and many sub-categories, however many of the papers involve overlapping topics. Many papers are short poetic nods/homage to a particular poem of a variety of famous poets and they are located in the mathematics and physics groupings mainly.
Aldington (Richard) A Dream in the Luxembourg Basho (Matsuo) and other Japanese poets re Tankas and Haikus Burns (Robert) Epitaph for James Smith Gershwin (Ira) The Saga of Jenny Howitt (Mary) The Spider and the Fly Keats (John) Ode to a Grecian Urn Khayyam (Omar) The Rubaiyat Kipling (Rudyard) Gunga Din Paterson (Banjo) The Man from Snowy River Poe (Edgar Allan) The Raven Shakespeare (William) Sonnet 18 Wilde (Oscar) To Milton ────────────────────────────
Stable particles of the Universe - protons and electrons - are in constant motion (there is a bac... more Stable particles of the Universe - protons and electrons - are in constant motion (there is a background component of their velocity), which is the source of the vacuum energy, explains the non-Newtonian vacuum potential and the curvature of space and determines the values of the gravitational and cosmological constants. This follows from the balance of interactions between a free electron and a proton, provided that there are no electrical forces and external influences.
This article illustrates how 11 new Laws of Conservation (Aleinikov, 2004, 2005, 2007a,b,c,d,e; A... more This article illustrates how 11 new Laws of Conservation (Aleinikov, 2004, 2005, 2007a,b,c,d,e; Aleinikov & Smarsh, 2007, 2009a, 2009b, 2011; Aleinikov & McFarland, 2008a, 2008b, 2009) expand the Bartini/Kuznetsov LT system of interpretation of laws of physics (Bartini, 1965, 1966, 2005; Kuznetsov & Bolshakov, 2000), thus expanding the physics and strategic management horizons. The new laws are described, explained, and, in some cases, shown in their application to real world problems, including outer space research and global strategic management issues. However, the main contribution of these discoveries is certainly the opening of new horizons for scientific research – the global strategic development of science. In the history of science, these new laws represent an opportunity for a heuristic leap. While in old times, it took about 50-100 years to discover one new law of conservation, the new approach offered by Robert Oros di Bartini and implemented by our research group, allo...
This paper was authored by Anatoly V. Belyakov in 2018 and presented by David Halprin davrin999... more This paper was authored by Anatoly V. Belyakov in 2018 and presented by David Halprin [email protected] on 7 July 2024
One of the citations of special interest in this paper from Progress in PhysicsVolume 14 (2018 ) is No.11 by Robert Oros di Bartini
On the Nature and Values of the Gravitational and Cosmological Constants-Anatoly V. Belyakov
Stable particles of the Universe — protons and electrons — are in constant motion, (there is a background component of their velocity), which is the source of the vacuum energy, explains the non-Newtonian vacuum potential and the curvature of space and determines the values of the gravitational and cosmological constants. This follows from the balance of interactions between a free electron and a proton, provided that there are no electrical forces and external influences.
This is the Bartini World, a collection of papers by Robert Oros di Bartini, collected from his archive by A.N.Maslov in 2009.
This English translation was made by PROMT, which did not use optical character recognition (OCR), but effected its translation directly from the PDF file by using artificial intelligence and hence is prone to may errors, and , in addition, omitted all scanned documants and consequently is only 86 pages.
Robert Oros di Bartini - Soviet aircraft designer, theoretical physicist, philosopher.Articles on physics and philosophy.Compiled by A.N. Maslov, M., “Self-education”, 2009, 224 pp.
Collection of articles on theoretical physics, cosmology and philosophy of the prominent Soviet aircraft designer R. di Bartini. In his physical works, R. di Bartini sketched the theory of 6-dimensional quantized space-time and proposed a method for reducing basic physical quantities to space-time ones. di Bartini's philosophical works were aimed at substantiating his physical concepts. Most articles are published for the first time.
The book is addressed to physicists, mathematicians, historians of science and technology, cultural experts, and everyone who is interested in self-education.
This is the Bartini World, a collection of papers by Robert Oros di Bartini, collected from his archive by A.N.Maslov in 2009.
This Russian language version includes many photographs and scanned hand-written documents and is 224 pages.
Robert Oros di Bartini - Soviet aircraft designer, theoretical physicist, philosopher.Articles on physics and philosophy.Compiled by A.N. Maslov, M., “Self-education”, 2009, 224 pp.
Collection of articles on theoretical physics, cosmology and philosophy of the prominent Soviet aircraft designer R. di Bartini. In his physical works, R. di Bartini sketched the theory of 6-dimensional quantized space-time and proposed a method for reducing basic physical quantities to space-time ones. di Bartini's philosophical works were aimed at substantiating his physical concepts. Most articles are published for the first time.
The book is addressed to physicists, mathematicians, historians of science and technology, cultural experts, and everyone who is interested in self-education.
PROLEGOMENON/PREAMBLE
Due to the wide variety of data necessary to explain the enigmatic title ... more PROLEGOMENON/PREAMBLE
Due to the wide variety of data necessary to explain the enigmatic title to this paper, there are three abstracts, graded to prepare the reader(s) for what ensues. One may compare two things, which are utterly dissimilar, yet there is some commonality. With respect to two seemingly different paradigms, this paper encompasses the revelations arising from making a comparison, which, at first, reveals a point in common, then a coincidental second one, then the emergence of a pattern leading to the inevitable conclusion of isometricity.
ABSTRACT-1
When a physicist theoretician attempts to formulate a paradigm to explain the existents and processes that constitute the physical universe, the most common approach is to base it on observations made by humans and their instruments. This often leads to conjectures/hypotheses that may seem unacceptable to the layman, so it is promulgated amongst the academic fraternity and may gain increasing acceptance if there are no cognitive dissonances. However, occasionally there is a physicist, who makes a different approach, whereby a paradigm is formulated that is either
1) partly speculative or even 2) purely speculative,
and thereby meets with resistance from academic colleagues. e.g. Albert Einstein
However, when deductions are made therefrom, that are able to account for observations, and as long as there are no errors detected, then it is acceptable.
e.g.1) Einstein's theories are those that are partly speculative.
e.g.2) However Robert Oros di Bartini `rocked' academia with such speculation that most of his colleagues laughed at him and said outright that it was a joke, resulting from a dare. Nevertheless his superb reputation as an aircraft designer for decades garnered him tacit support to the extent that Bruno Pontecorvo at the behest of S.S. Gershtein read an edited version to the Russian Akademy. di Bartini was pleased in one sense, but at the same time would have preferred it not to have been edited. di Bartini's approach was via Combinatorial Topology, (a precursor to Algebraic Topology), and then Topological algebra), whereby he was able to elucidate some relations between physical quantities, to both the amazement and consternation of the academic fraternity. Maybe it would have faded away but for a very astute Radio Engineer, (D.S.Kontorov), who `extracted' the nub of di Bartini's methodology in that a system of generalised dimensions was an essential tool for di Bartini. David Solomonovich Kontorov was able to adapt an appropriate system of dimensions for his paper (see copy on Academia.edu)
A Method of Making Systematic Investigations Part 2, Radio Engineering Volume 35 1981 So others from the academic world seized on that and realised how powerful a tool it was. Eventually a succession of papers appeared advancing that concept from algebraic topology culminating in "Eleven New Laws of Conservation Expanding Physics for Global Strategic Management and Strategic Development", which are adaptable to real life situations, outside the realm of physics. viz. Viva-di-bartini Macrothink Institute, Business Management and Strategy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ABSTRACT-2 RELATIONS BETWEEN PHYSICAL CONSTANTS
(Translated from Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, Vol 163 No.4 pp 861/864 August 1965.)
INTRODUCTION It is known that group-theoretical and topological methods may be used effectively in the explanation of physical problems. There are well-known investigations about the discrete structural character of space, and about the inter-connection between atomic and cosmological values also. However, the analytical connection between basic physical values has not been established, and these values have been determined experimentally, as there is not such a theory, which can give a method for their theoretical determination. In this work, a condensed exposition of the analytical connection between basic physical constants is given.
EXPLANATION Much of di Bartini's paper makes use of a Generalised System of Dimensions, which is a novel approach. This concept so intrigued another Russian author (David Solomonovich Kontorov), that he adopted it in his paper on an entirely different subject with great success. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ABSTRACT-3 Over the millennia, there have been many paradigms explaining the physical universe both textually and mathematically, and for the most part, the mathematics has been founded/based on geometry and trigonometry. Cognitive differences have abounded, without resolution. The Big Bang Theory and The Steady State theory, were the only two widely known contenders for the ultimate explanation of the truth and because of that, when the Steady State Theory was proven to be faulty, the Big bang was accepted universally throughout all academia, (in schools and universities, as well as astronomical societies etc.). Notwithstanding the achievements of science with those assorted theories, their actual validity as being `quantum sufficit' was never proven. Essentially we can get along quite well with the admixture of the assortment, knowing/believing full well that we cannot achieve a unified theory that encompasses them all. e.g. Special Relativity, General Relativity and Quantum Theory cannot be merged into a Grand Unified Theory (GUT). So although this paper does not purport to have the ultimate answer to the dilemma, it may go a long way towards that end. This paper is based on the work of two independent scientists, who did neither know of the other's existence nor their publications, however their theoretical researches, in essence, although presented in different mathematical languages (vernaculars), are identical. A summary of their lives, background etc. follows:-
This article illustrates how 11 new Laws of Conservation expand the Bartini/Kuznetsov LT system o... more This article illustrates how 11 new Laws of Conservation expand the Bartini/Kuznetsov LT system of interpretation of laws of physics (Bartini, 1965, 1966, 2005; Kuznetsov & Bolshakov, 2000), thus expanding the physics and strategic management horizons. The new laws are described, explained, and, in some cases, shown in their application to real world problems, including outer space research and global strategic management issues. However, the main contribution of these discoveries is certainly the opening of new horizons for scientific research, the global strategic development of science. In the history of science, these new laws represent an opportunity for a heuristic leap. While in old times, it took about 50-100 years to discover one new law of conservation, the new approach offered by Robert Oros di Bartini and implemented by our research group, (modern day `Bourbakists'), allowed us to discover 11 new laws of conservation within five years. It means 100 times acceleration! That's why this article is titled "Viva di Bartini!". It emphasises the contribution of the great engineer and scientist, named a "prescient genius" by press, to the strategic development of science, including the first in the world MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR LAWS OF CONSERVATION that led to a revolutionary leap in developing new laws and new sciences, including the science of genius "Geniusology", first mentioned in 2003, published in 2004, as described in (Aleinikov, 2013a). For the reader(s), who want(s) to see the actual proofs of these Laws of Conservation, see REFERENCES below.
ABSTRACT/PREFACE
(Translated from Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, Vol 163 No.4
pp 861/864 August 196... more ABSTRACT/PREFACE (Translated from Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, Vol 163 No.4 pp 861/864 August 1965. Omitted text from above translation was translated in Melbourne at the behest of, and cost to, David Halprin, taken from the original paper, in the book of the symposium on Gravitation.) It is known that group-theoretical and topological methods may be used effectively in the explanation of physical problems. There are well-known investigations about the discrete structural character of the space, and about the inter-connection between atomic and cosmological values also. However, the analytical connection between basic physical values has not been established, and these values have been determined experimentally, as there is not such a theory, which can give a method for their theoretical determination. In this work, a condensed exposition of the analytical connection between basic physical constants is given. Much of di Bartini's paper makes use of a Generalised System of Dimensions, which is a novel approach. This concept so intrigued another Russian author (David Solomonovich Kontorov), that he adopted it in his paper on an entirely different subject with great success.
This is taken from a paper by D.S. Kontorov, who based it on the paper by Robert Oros di Bartini.... more This is taken from a paper by D.S. Kontorov, who based it on the paper by Robert Oros di Bartini. A single metric, (and efficiency criteria), are required for a functional description of a model or paradigm. The metric is formed on the basis of an adequate system of dimensions, which should cover all factors, even economic ones, if pertinent to a particular paradigm. Since not one of these systems of dimensions used in Physics (SI, CGS etc.) satisfies all requirements, we propose to introduce a generalised system of dimensions, based on a kinematic systems and on the monetary equivalent of energy-"energy potential". In this system
ABSTRACT.WPF
When a physicist theoretician attempts to formulate a paradigm to explain the exist... more ABSTRACT.WPF When a physicist theoretician attempts to formulate a paradigm to explain the existents and processes that constitute the physical universe, the most common approach is to base it on observations made by humans and their instruments. This often leads to conjectures/hypotheses that may seem unacceptable to the layman, so it is promulgated amongst the academic fraternity and may gain increasing acceptance if there are no cognitive dissonances. However, occasionally there is a physicist, who makes a different approach, whereby a paradigm is formulated that is either
1) partly speculative or even 2) purely speculative,
and thereby meets with resistance from academic colleagues. However, when deductions are made therefrom, that are able to account for observations, and as long as there are no errors detected, then it is acceptable. e.g.1) Einstein's theories are those that are partly speculative.
e.g.2) However Robert Oros di Bartini `rocked' academia with such speculation that most of his colleagues laughed at him and said outright that it was a joke resulting from a dare. Nevertheless his superb reputation as an aircraft designer for decades garnered him tacit support to the extent that Bruno Pontecorvo at the behest of S.S. Gershtein read an edited version to the Russian Akademy. di Bartini was pleased in one sense, but at the same time would have preferred it not to have been edited. di Bartini's approach was via Combinatorial Topology, (a precursor to Algebraic Topology), and it was able to elucidate some relations between physical quantities, to both the amazement and consternation of the academic fraternity. Maybe it would have faded away but for a very astute Radio Engineer, who `extracted' the nub of di Bartini's methodology in that a system of generalised dimensions was an essential tool for di Bartini. David Solomonovich Kontorov was able to adapt an appropriate system of dimensions for his paper (see David Halprin's copy on Academia.edu) A Method of Making Systematic Investigations Part 2, Radio Engineering Volume 35 1981 So others from the academic world seized on that and realised how powerful a tool it was. Eventually a succession of papers appeared advancing that concept from algebraic topology culminating in "Eleven New Laws of Conservation Expanding Physics for Global Strategic Management and Strategic Development", which are adaptable to real life situations, outside the realm of physics. viz. Viva-di-bartini Macrothink Institute, Business Management and Strategy ISSN 2157-6068 2020 Vol 11, No.1 REFERENCES Viva Di Bartini: Eleven New Laws of Conservation Expanding Physics for Global Strategic Management and Strategic Development. Andrei G. Aleinikov (Corresponding author) [email protected] David A. Smarsh [email protected] International Academy of Genius 2231 Segundo Ct., Unit 2, Pleasanton, CA, 94588, USA ------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1990 Edwin Navarro unwittingly published a short paper, the contents of which mirrored much of... more In 1990 Edwin Navarro unwittingly published a short paper, the contents of which mirrored much of what transpired between Halprin, Asimov, Adamson etc as can be seen on the previous paper on Academia.edu
This paper is a historic accumulation of letters to and fro between this writer, Isaac Asimov, Ch... more This paper is a historic accumulation of letters to and fro between this writer, Isaac Asimov, Chemical and Engineering News, Arthur Adamson and the members of New Science Advocates (NSA), later renamed International Society of Unified Science (ISUS), all of which concern Dewey Bernard Larson (1898-1990) and his Reciprocal System of Theory (RST). The final `end note' refers to a paper written by Edwin Navarro in 1990 for the quarterly journal, (Reciprocity), published and edited by Professor Frank Meyer of the University of Wisconsin for the advocates of RST, being the International Society of Unified Science Inc. (ISUS). 1) On 29 July 1963, Isaac Asimov published a review of Dewey Larson's research findings (RST) In Chemical and Engineering News. 2) On 9 September 1963 Arthur Adamson published his review of Asimov's review of RST. 3) On 9 September 1963 in the same journal, Asimov published his reply to Adamson.
Demonstration how algorithm lends perspicuous realisation in neat classification of the many redu... more Demonstration how algorithm lends perspicuous realisation in neat classification of the many reduced equations of approximately 29 distinct quadric `surfaces', including the degenerate and imaginary ones. The aim of this paper is to produce an algorithm for the classification of any quadratic form, whose general equation in three variables, in matrix notation, is:
This paper subsumes Analytical Conics and much more to cover all quadratics under transformations... more This paper subsumes Analytical Conics and much more to cover all quadratics under transformations, rotated. and/or translated and/or deformed.
These Über-Functions U (p,q,r,s,k) subsume a multiplicatively infinite set of many known function... more These Über-Functions U (p,q,r,s,k) subsume a multiplicatively infinite set of many known functions and manifold more functions, which, heretofore, have not been investigated formerly and/or formally. Where m = ½, 1, 2, 3 or 4; k = 0, ±½, 1 or 2; p = ±1, ±2, ±3 or ±4; q = ±½, 0, 1, 2 or 3. N.B. In this paper N = ½, 1, 2, 3 & 4. r is chosen to be about 25 for good plotting, but is infinite for a true representation of all functions, listed below.
This paper fully respects the ancient wisdom and procedures employed/utilised in the practice of ... more This paper fully respects the ancient wisdom and procedures employed/utilised in the practice of meditation. The countless millions of practitioners worldwide are evidence of its many benefits. Despite its obvious success, many people have tried it and given up in frustration, disappointment, failure, futility, dissatisfaction, defeat, discontentment and/or disillusionment. In many cases their instructor(s) indoctrinated, (propagandised, filled, infused, instilled, imparted), it with pseudo-religious or actual religious overtones, (implications, ramifications, intimations, suggestions, nuances, connections, involvement, allusions, correlation), thereby driving the would-be adherent, (follower, disciple), to dispense with it, alas and alack. Probably unbeknownst to most instructors is that modern technology, long since, has caught up with meditation, by analysing its effects on the brain and producing a technology assistant, resulting in a much simpler DIY methodology. This will be shown to the reader in what follows in the paper below.
How a series of sheer chance serendipitous events have brought about very many papers written and... more How a series of sheer chance serendipitous events have brought about very many papers written and/or reprinted by this writer and uploaded onto Academia.edu. THE EVENTS Aged 9.5 yrs. at a new school, being asked by the form mistress, "Do you like arithmetic David?", upon which I hastily said "yes", despite that not being the case, but it became a consequent commitment. Having earned school prize awards for mathematics in years 11 & 12, I felt deprived of mathematics when studying a four-year course of pharmacy. So, later on, I decided to study part-time mathematics at Melbourne University, and on my way to enrol, I accidentally met up with my cousin, who was an associate professor in physics (Geoffrey Opat), who having asked me what I was doing there, he instructed me to enrol in the honours course, which he explained was a different curriculum to the pass course. This brought me into contact with Professor Felix Adelbert Behrend, a mathematician from Germany, who escaped to England and came to Australia as a migrant on the migrant ship Duneera. He had introduced Logic into the curriculum and for that I have been eternally grateful for its use in so many areas. Later on, one day in my pharmacy, a travelling salesman proffered several board games to stock, one of which was Wff'n Proof. I bought it for myself and as I familiarised it for my own edification, I realised that it was a subtle way of teaching every player the rules of forming symbolic logic sentences and/or syllogisms, using a vastly superior methodology to that of the current usage, albeit unwittingly. This was my introduction to ¸ukasiewiz symbology, commonly called "Polish Logic". Its superiority to current symbology is that it is parenthesis-free. N.B. For many years, "Reverse Polish Logic" was used by Hewlett Packard in their HP hand-held calculatiors in all their models. Two years later, in 1964, when at Melbourne University on open day, I bought a copy of the annual science Journal, `Science Review', in which was a paper "Time is the Essence" by Dewey Larson. I was intrigued immediately and wanted to know more about that very subject and its author. Some time later, (1968), an air-mail letter to the research department of Encyclopaedia Britannica resulted in the address of North Pacific Publishers, through whom I would be able to contact Dewey Larson. This was the beginning of a 22 year relationship, ending in 1990 with his passing. Dewey introduced me via correspondence to Professor Frank Meyer of the physics department of the University of Wisconsin. One of his specialities was crystallography. So I ordered a set of 5 books from North Pacific Publishers and started my journey of learning and understanding the Reciprocal System of Theory, (RST), especially its fundamental postulates, from which a vast many deductions are made. Included with one of Dewey's letters to me was a photocopy of a partly translated Russian paper by Robert Oros di Bartini (1897-1974), that was sent to Dewey by one of his correspondents in the belief that it shared some common findings with RST. Dewey made no comments about the paper, other than to think that it may interest me. As a result of that, I wrote to the Russian publisher in the hope that my letter would be forwarded to di Bartini. Unlike the internet of today, these airmail letters took many weeks, and eventually I received my first letter from di Bartini as well as a copy of the Russian language book of the proceedings of the Academy on Gravitation including his paper, wherein there was much more detail than the copy that I had. So I approached one of my customers, who was in charge of the language laboratory at Melbourne University, and he had the extra parts translated by a non-scientific linguist, where so many terms were incorrectly translated. Eventually a longer translation was printed many years later on the web. Nevertheless my correspondence with di Bartini had a good start. In his last letter to me, he commented on a suggestion, that I had sent, and his letter contained some math. equations to help me.
This is a reprint of a paper by Prof. K.V.K. Nehru explicatory of one of the innovative concepts ... more This is a reprint of a paper by Prof. K.V.K. Nehru explicatory of one of the innovative concepts of Dewey Larson in his Reciprocal System of Physical Theory. The quarterly journal, Reciprocity, Volume XIV, Number 2-3, Winter 1985/86 of the International Society of Unified Science (ISUS).
INTRODUCTION/ABSTRACT
This is a comprehensive coverage of various forms of logic, which is caref... more INTRODUCTION/ABSTRACT This is a comprehensive coverage of various forms of logic, which is carefully explained so that the reader(s) will be able to deal with everyday syllogisms and their use and frequent misuse. Syllogisms occur in everyday conversations, often without realisation by the speaker(s) and/or listener(s).
INTRODUCTION/PREAMBLE
There are 5 main categories and many sub-categories, however many ... more INTRODUCTION/PREAMBLE There are 5 main categories and many sub-categories, however many of the papers involve overlapping topics. Many papers are short poetic nods/homage to a particular poem of a variety of famous poets and they are located in the mathematics and physics groupings mainly.
Aldington (Richard) A Dream in the Luxembourg Basho (Matsuo) and other Japanese poets re Tankas and Haikus Burns (Robert) Epitaph for James Smith Gershwin (Ira) The Saga of Jenny Howitt (Mary) The Spider and the Fly Keats (John) Ode to a Grecian Urn Khayyam (Omar) The Rubaiyat Kipling (Rudyard) Gunga Din Paterson (Banjo) The Man from Snowy River Poe (Edgar Allan) The Raven Shakespeare (William) Sonnet 18 Wilde (Oscar) To Milton ────────────────────────────
Stable particles of the Universe - protons and electrons - are in constant motion (there is a bac... more Stable particles of the Universe - protons and electrons - are in constant motion (there is a background component of their velocity), which is the source of the vacuum energy, explains the non-Newtonian vacuum potential and the curvature of space and determines the values of the gravitational and cosmological constants. This follows from the balance of interactions between a free electron and a proton, provided that there are no electrical forces and external influences.
This article illustrates how 11 new Laws of Conservation (Aleinikov, 2004, 2005, 2007a,b,c,d,e; A... more This article illustrates how 11 new Laws of Conservation (Aleinikov, 2004, 2005, 2007a,b,c,d,e; Aleinikov & Smarsh, 2007, 2009a, 2009b, 2011; Aleinikov & McFarland, 2008a, 2008b, 2009) expand the Bartini/Kuznetsov LT system of interpretation of laws of physics (Bartini, 1965, 1966, 2005; Kuznetsov & Bolshakov, 2000), thus expanding the physics and strategic management horizons. The new laws are described, explained, and, in some cases, shown in their application to real world problems, including outer space research and global strategic management issues. However, the main contribution of these discoveries is certainly the opening of new horizons for scientific research – the global strategic development of science. In the history of science, these new laws represent an opportunity for a heuristic leap. While in old times, it took about 50-100 years to discover one new law of conservation, the new approach offered by Robert Oros di Bartini and implemented by our research group, allo...
This paper was authored by Anatoly V. Belyakov in 2018 and presented by David Halprin davrin999... more This paper was authored by Anatoly V. Belyakov in 2018 and presented by David Halprin [email protected] on 7 July 2024
One of the citations of special interest in this paper from Progress in PhysicsVolume 14 (2018 ) is No.11 by Robert Oros di Bartini
On the Nature and Values of the Gravitational and Cosmological Constants-Anatoly V. Belyakov
Stable particles of the Universe — protons and electrons — are in constant motion, (there is a background component of their velocity), which is the source of the vacuum energy, explains the non-Newtonian vacuum potential and the curvature of space and determines the values of the gravitational and cosmological constants. This follows from the balance of interactions between a free electron and a proton, provided that there are no electrical forces and external influences.
This is the Bartini World, a collection of papers by Robert Oros di Bartini, collected from his archive by A.N.Maslov in 2009.
This English translation was made by PROMT, which did not use optical character recognition (OCR), but effected its translation directly from the PDF file by using artificial intelligence and hence is prone to may errors, and , in addition, omitted all scanned documants and consequently is only 86 pages.
Robert Oros di Bartini - Soviet aircraft designer, theoretical physicist, philosopher.Articles on physics and philosophy.Compiled by A.N. Maslov, M., “Self-education”, 2009, 224 pp.
Collection of articles on theoretical physics, cosmology and philosophy of the prominent Soviet aircraft designer R. di Bartini. In his physical works, R. di Bartini sketched the theory of 6-dimensional quantized space-time and proposed a method for reducing basic physical quantities to space-time ones. di Bartini's philosophical works were aimed at substantiating his physical concepts. Most articles are published for the first time.
The book is addressed to physicists, mathematicians, historians of science and technology, cultural experts, and everyone who is interested in self-education.
This is the Bartini World, a collection of papers by Robert Oros di Bartini, collected from his archive by A.N.Maslov in 2009.
This Russian language version includes many photographs and scanned hand-written documents and is 224 pages.
Robert Oros di Bartini - Soviet aircraft designer, theoretical physicist, philosopher.Articles on physics and philosophy.Compiled by A.N. Maslov, M., “Self-education”, 2009, 224 pp.
Collection of articles on theoretical physics, cosmology and philosophy of the prominent Soviet aircraft designer R. di Bartini. In his physical works, R. di Bartini sketched the theory of 6-dimensional quantized space-time and proposed a method for reducing basic physical quantities to space-time ones. di Bartini's philosophical works were aimed at substantiating his physical concepts. Most articles are published for the first time.
The book is addressed to physicists, mathematicians, historians of science and technology, cultural experts, and everyone who is interested in self-education.
PROLEGOMENON/PREAMBLE
Due to the wide variety of data necessary to explain the enigmatic title ... more PROLEGOMENON/PREAMBLE
Due to the wide variety of data necessary to explain the enigmatic title to this paper, there are three abstracts, graded to prepare the reader(s) for what ensues. One may compare two things, which are utterly dissimilar, yet there is some commonality. With respect to two seemingly different paradigms, this paper encompasses the revelations arising from making a comparison, which, at first, reveals a point in common, then a coincidental second one, then the emergence of a pattern leading to the inevitable conclusion of isometricity.
ABSTRACT-1
When a physicist theoretician attempts to formulate a paradigm to explain the existents and processes that constitute the physical universe, the most common approach is to base it on observations made by humans and their instruments. This often leads to conjectures/hypotheses that may seem unacceptable to the layman, so it is promulgated amongst the academic fraternity and may gain increasing acceptance if there are no cognitive dissonances. However, occasionally there is a physicist, who makes a different approach, whereby a paradigm is formulated that is either
1) partly speculative or even 2) purely speculative,
and thereby meets with resistance from academic colleagues. e.g. Albert Einstein
However, when deductions are made therefrom, that are able to account for observations, and as long as there are no errors detected, then it is acceptable.
e.g.1) Einstein's theories are those that are partly speculative.
e.g.2) However Robert Oros di Bartini `rocked' academia with such speculation that most of his colleagues laughed at him and said outright that it was a joke, resulting from a dare. Nevertheless his superb reputation as an aircraft designer for decades garnered him tacit support to the extent that Bruno Pontecorvo at the behest of S.S. Gershtein read an edited version to the Russian Akademy. di Bartini was pleased in one sense, but at the same time would have preferred it not to have been edited. di Bartini's approach was via Combinatorial Topology, (a precursor to Algebraic Topology), and then Topological algebra), whereby he was able to elucidate some relations between physical quantities, to both the amazement and consternation of the academic fraternity. Maybe it would have faded away but for a very astute Radio Engineer, (D.S.Kontorov), who `extracted' the nub of di Bartini's methodology in that a system of generalised dimensions was an essential tool for di Bartini. David Solomonovich Kontorov was able to adapt an appropriate system of dimensions for his paper (see copy on Academia.edu)
A Method of Making Systematic Investigations Part 2, Radio Engineering Volume 35 1981 So others from the academic world seized on that and realised how powerful a tool it was. Eventually a succession of papers appeared advancing that concept from algebraic topology culminating in "Eleven New Laws of Conservation Expanding Physics for Global Strategic Management and Strategic Development", which are adaptable to real life situations, outside the realm of physics. viz. Viva-di-bartini Macrothink Institute, Business Management and Strategy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ABSTRACT-2 RELATIONS BETWEEN PHYSICAL CONSTANTS
(Translated from Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, Vol 163 No.4 pp 861/864 August 1965.)
INTRODUCTION It is known that group-theoretical and topological methods may be used effectively in the explanation of physical problems. There are well-known investigations about the discrete structural character of space, and about the inter-connection between atomic and cosmological values also. However, the analytical connection between basic physical values has not been established, and these values have been determined experimentally, as there is not such a theory, which can give a method for their theoretical determination. In this work, a condensed exposition of the analytical connection between basic physical constants is given.
EXPLANATION Much of di Bartini's paper makes use of a Generalised System of Dimensions, which is a novel approach. This concept so intrigued another Russian author (David Solomonovich Kontorov), that he adopted it in his paper on an entirely different subject with great success. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ABSTRACT-3 Over the millennia, there have been many paradigms explaining the physical universe both textually and mathematically, and for the most part, the mathematics has been founded/based on geometry and trigonometry. Cognitive differences have abounded, without resolution. The Big Bang Theory and The Steady State theory, were the only two widely known contenders for the ultimate explanation of the truth and because of that, when the Steady State Theory was proven to be faulty, the Big bang was accepted universally throughout all academia, (in schools and universities, as well as astronomical societies etc.). Notwithstanding the achievements of science with those assorted theories, their actual validity as being `quantum sufficit' was never proven. Essentially we can get along quite well with the admixture of the assortment, knowing/believing full well that we cannot achieve a unified theory that encompasses them all. e.g. Special Relativity, General Relativity and Quantum Theory cannot be merged into a Grand Unified Theory (GUT). So although this paper does not purport to have the ultimate answer to the dilemma, it may go a long way towards that end. This paper is based on the work of two independent scientists, who did neither know of the other's existence nor their publications, however their theoretical researches, in essence, although presented in different mathematical languages (vernaculars), are identical. A summary of their lives, background etc. follows:-
This article illustrates how 11 new Laws of Conservation expand the Bartini/Kuznetsov LT system o... more This article illustrates how 11 new Laws of Conservation expand the Bartini/Kuznetsov LT system of interpretation of laws of physics (Bartini, 1965, 1966, 2005; Kuznetsov & Bolshakov, 2000), thus expanding the physics and strategic management horizons. The new laws are described, explained, and, in some cases, shown in their application to real world problems, including outer space research and global strategic management issues. However, the main contribution of these discoveries is certainly the opening of new horizons for scientific research, the global strategic development of science. In the history of science, these new laws represent an opportunity for a heuristic leap. While in old times, it took about 50-100 years to discover one new law of conservation, the new approach offered by Robert Oros di Bartini and implemented by our research group, (modern day `Bourbakists'), allowed us to discover 11 new laws of conservation within five years. It means 100 times acceleration! That's why this article is titled "Viva di Bartini!". It emphasises the contribution of the great engineer and scientist, named a "prescient genius" by press, to the strategic development of science, including the first in the world MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR LAWS OF CONSERVATION that led to a revolutionary leap in developing new laws and new sciences, including the science of genius "Geniusology", first mentioned in 2003, published in 2004, as described in (Aleinikov, 2013a). For the reader(s), who want(s) to see the actual proofs of these Laws of Conservation, see REFERENCES below.
ABSTRACT/PREFACE
(Translated from Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, Vol 163 No.4
pp 861/864 August 196... more ABSTRACT/PREFACE (Translated from Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, Vol 163 No.4 pp 861/864 August 1965. Omitted text from above translation was translated in Melbourne at the behest of, and cost to, David Halprin, taken from the original paper, in the book of the symposium on Gravitation.) It is known that group-theoretical and topological methods may be used effectively in the explanation of physical problems. There are well-known investigations about the discrete structural character of the space, and about the inter-connection between atomic and cosmological values also. However, the analytical connection between basic physical values has not been established, and these values have been determined experimentally, as there is not such a theory, which can give a method for their theoretical determination. In this work, a condensed exposition of the analytical connection between basic physical constants is given. Much of di Bartini's paper makes use of a Generalised System of Dimensions, which is a novel approach. This concept so intrigued another Russian author (David Solomonovich Kontorov), that he adopted it in his paper on an entirely different subject with great success.
This is taken from a paper by D.S. Kontorov, who based it on the paper by Robert Oros di Bartini.... more This is taken from a paper by D.S. Kontorov, who based it on the paper by Robert Oros di Bartini. A single metric, (and efficiency criteria), are required for a functional description of a model or paradigm. The metric is formed on the basis of an adequate system of dimensions, which should cover all factors, even economic ones, if pertinent to a particular paradigm. Since not one of these systems of dimensions used in Physics (SI, CGS etc.) satisfies all requirements, we propose to introduce a generalised system of dimensions, based on a kinematic systems and on the monetary equivalent of energy-"energy potential". In this system
ABSTRACT.WPF
When a physicist theoretician attempts to formulate a paradigm to explain the exist... more ABSTRACT.WPF When a physicist theoretician attempts to formulate a paradigm to explain the existents and processes that constitute the physical universe, the most common approach is to base it on observations made by humans and their instruments. This often leads to conjectures/hypotheses that may seem unacceptable to the layman, so it is promulgated amongst the academic fraternity and may gain increasing acceptance if there are no cognitive dissonances. However, occasionally there is a physicist, who makes a different approach, whereby a paradigm is formulated that is either
1) partly speculative or even 2) purely speculative,
and thereby meets with resistance from academic colleagues. However, when deductions are made therefrom, that are able to account for observations, and as long as there are no errors detected, then it is acceptable. e.g.1) Einstein's theories are those that are partly speculative.
e.g.2) However Robert Oros di Bartini `rocked' academia with such speculation that most of his colleagues laughed at him and said outright that it was a joke resulting from a dare. Nevertheless his superb reputation as an aircraft designer for decades garnered him tacit support to the extent that Bruno Pontecorvo at the behest of S.S. Gershtein read an edited version to the Russian Akademy. di Bartini was pleased in one sense, but at the same time would have preferred it not to have been edited. di Bartini's approach was via Combinatorial Topology, (a precursor to Algebraic Topology), and it was able to elucidate some relations between physical quantities, to both the amazement and consternation of the academic fraternity. Maybe it would have faded away but for a very astute Radio Engineer, who `extracted' the nub of di Bartini's methodology in that a system of generalised dimensions was an essential tool for di Bartini. David Solomonovich Kontorov was able to adapt an appropriate system of dimensions for his paper (see David Halprin's copy on Academia.edu) A Method of Making Systematic Investigations Part 2, Radio Engineering Volume 35 1981 So others from the academic world seized on that and realised how powerful a tool it was. Eventually a succession of papers appeared advancing that concept from algebraic topology culminating in "Eleven New Laws of Conservation Expanding Physics for Global Strategic Management and Strategic Development", which are adaptable to real life situations, outside the realm of physics. viz. Viva-di-bartini Macrothink Institute, Business Management and Strategy ISSN 2157-6068 2020 Vol 11, No.1 REFERENCES Viva Di Bartini: Eleven New Laws of Conservation Expanding Physics for Global Strategic Management and Strategic Development. Andrei G. Aleinikov (Corresponding author) [email protected] David A. Smarsh [email protected] International Academy of Genius 2231 Segundo Ct., Unit 2, Pleasanton, CA, 94588, USA ------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1990 Edwin Navarro unwittingly published a short paper, the contents of which mirrored much of... more In 1990 Edwin Navarro unwittingly published a short paper, the contents of which mirrored much of what transpired between Halprin, Asimov, Adamson etc as can be seen on the previous paper on Academia.edu
This paper is a historic accumulation of letters to and fro between this writer, Isaac Asimov, Ch... more This paper is a historic accumulation of letters to and fro between this writer, Isaac Asimov, Chemical and Engineering News, Arthur Adamson and the members of New Science Advocates (NSA), later renamed International Society of Unified Science (ISUS), all of which concern Dewey Bernard Larson (1898-1990) and his Reciprocal System of Theory (RST). The final `end note' refers to a paper written by Edwin Navarro in 1990 for the quarterly journal, (Reciprocity), published and edited by Professor Frank Meyer of the University of Wisconsin for the advocates of RST, being the International Society of Unified Science Inc. (ISUS). 1) On 29 July 1963, Isaac Asimov published a review of Dewey Larson's research findings (RST) In Chemical and Engineering News. 2) On 9 September 1963 Arthur Adamson published his review of Asimov's review of RST. 3) On 9 September 1963 in the same journal, Asimov published his reply to Adamson.
Demonstration how algorithm lends perspicuous realisation in neat classification of the many redu... more Demonstration how algorithm lends perspicuous realisation in neat classification of the many reduced equations of approximately 29 distinct quadric `surfaces', including the degenerate and imaginary ones. The aim of this paper is to produce an algorithm for the classification of any quadratic form, whose general equation in three variables, in matrix notation, is:
This paper subsumes Analytical Conics and much more to cover all quadratics under transformations... more This paper subsumes Analytical Conics and much more to cover all quadratics under transformations, rotated. and/or translated and/or deformed.
These Über-Functions U (p,q,r,s,k) subsume a multiplicatively infinite set of many known function... more These Über-Functions U (p,q,r,s,k) subsume a multiplicatively infinite set of many known functions and manifold more functions, which, heretofore, have not been investigated formerly and/or formally. Where m = ½, 1, 2, 3 or 4; k = 0, ±½, 1 or 2; p = ±1, ±2, ±3 or ±4; q = ±½, 0, 1, 2 or 3. N.B. In this paper N = ½, 1, 2, 3 & 4. r is chosen to be about 25 for good plotting, but is infinite for a true representation of all functions, listed below.
This paper fully respects the ancient wisdom and procedures employed/utilised in the practice of ... more This paper fully respects the ancient wisdom and procedures employed/utilised in the practice of meditation. The countless millions of practitioners worldwide are evidence of its many benefits. Despite its obvious success, many people have tried it and given up in frustration, disappointment, failure, futility, dissatisfaction, defeat, discontentment and/or disillusionment. In many cases their instructor(s) indoctrinated, (propagandised, filled, infused, instilled, imparted), it with pseudo-religious or actual religious overtones, (implications, ramifications, intimations, suggestions, nuances, connections, involvement, allusions, correlation), thereby driving the would-be adherent, (follower, disciple), to dispense with it, alas and alack. Probably unbeknownst to most instructors is that modern technology, long since, has caught up with meditation, by analysing its effects on the brain and producing a technology assistant, resulting in a much simpler DIY methodology. This will be shown to the reader in what follows in the paper below.
How a series of sheer chance serendipitous events have brought about very many papers written and... more How a series of sheer chance serendipitous events have brought about very many papers written and/or reprinted by this writer and uploaded onto Academia.edu. THE EVENTS Aged 9.5 yrs. at a new school, being asked by the form mistress, "Do you like arithmetic David?", upon which I hastily said "yes", despite that not being the case, but it became a consequent commitment. Having earned school prize awards for mathematics in years 11 & 12, I felt deprived of mathematics when studying a four-year course of pharmacy. So, later on, I decided to study part-time mathematics at Melbourne University, and on my way to enrol, I accidentally met up with my cousin, who was an associate professor in physics (Geoffrey Opat), who having asked me what I was doing there, he instructed me to enrol in the honours course, which he explained was a different curriculum to the pass course. This brought me into contact with Professor Felix Adelbert Behrend, a mathematician from Germany, who escaped to England and came to Australia as a migrant on the migrant ship Duneera. He had introduced Logic into the curriculum and for that I have been eternally grateful for its use in so many areas. Later on, one day in my pharmacy, a travelling salesman proffered several board games to stock, one of which was Wff'n Proof. I bought it for myself and as I familiarised it for my own edification, I realised that it was a subtle way of teaching every player the rules of forming symbolic logic sentences and/or syllogisms, using a vastly superior methodology to that of the current usage, albeit unwittingly. This was my introduction to ¸ukasiewiz symbology, commonly called "Polish Logic". Its superiority to current symbology is that it is parenthesis-free. N.B. For many years, "Reverse Polish Logic" was used by Hewlett Packard in their HP hand-held calculatiors in all their models. Two years later, in 1964, when at Melbourne University on open day, I bought a copy of the annual science Journal, `Science Review', in which was a paper "Time is the Essence" by Dewey Larson. I was intrigued immediately and wanted to know more about that very subject and its author. Some time later, (1968), an air-mail letter to the research department of Encyclopaedia Britannica resulted in the address of North Pacific Publishers, through whom I would be able to contact Dewey Larson. This was the beginning of a 22 year relationship, ending in 1990 with his passing. Dewey introduced me via correspondence to Professor Frank Meyer of the physics department of the University of Wisconsin. One of his specialities was crystallography. So I ordered a set of 5 books from North Pacific Publishers and started my journey of learning and understanding the Reciprocal System of Theory, (RST), especially its fundamental postulates, from which a vast many deductions are made. Included with one of Dewey's letters to me was a photocopy of a partly translated Russian paper by Robert Oros di Bartini (1897-1974), that was sent to Dewey by one of his correspondents in the belief that it shared some common findings with RST. Dewey made no comments about the paper, other than to think that it may interest me. As a result of that, I wrote to the Russian publisher in the hope that my letter would be forwarded to di Bartini. Unlike the internet of today, these airmail letters took many weeks, and eventually I received my first letter from di Bartini as well as a copy of the Russian language book of the proceedings of the Academy on Gravitation including his paper, wherein there was much more detail than the copy that I had. So I approached one of my customers, who was in charge of the language laboratory at Melbourne University, and he had the extra parts translated by a non-scientific linguist, where so many terms were incorrectly translated. Eventually a longer translation was printed many years later on the web. Nevertheless my correspondence with di Bartini had a good start. In his last letter to me, he commented on a suggestion, that I had sent, and his letter contained some math. equations to help me.
This is a reprint of a paper by Prof. K.V.K. Nehru explicatory of one of the innovative concepts ... more This is a reprint of a paper by Prof. K.V.K. Nehru explicatory of one of the innovative concepts of Dewey Larson in his Reciprocal System of Physical Theory. The quarterly journal, Reciprocity, Volume XIV, Number 2-3, Winter 1985/86 of the International Society of Unified Science (ISUS).
This paper contains many interrelated sections, most of which are complete. Those, that are incom... more This paper contains many interrelated sections, most of which are complete. Those, that are incomplete, are `works-in-progress' and their updated versions are intended for appearance ASAP, hopefully monthly. This premature publication is due to the recent news broadcast of research findings (the black hole Sagittarius A and dark matter) of the Nobel prize winners
PREFACE INTRODUCTORY TO DRAFT 3; EXPLANATORY IMPORTANT NOTICE
This paper contains many interrel... more PREFACE INTRODUCTORY TO DRAFT 3; EXPLANATORY IMPORTANT NOTICE
This paper contains many interrelated sections, most of which are complete. Those, that are incomplete, are `works-in-progress' and their updated versions are intended for appearance ASAP, hopefully weekly. This premature publication is due to the recent news broadcast of research findings (the black hole Sagittarius A and dark matter) of the Nobel prize winners Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel and Andrea Ghez. Their areas of research are also covered in this draft paper, and each reader has the opportunity to make his/her own personal discernment and/or judgement of the conclusions thereof. ────────────────────────────────────
Uploads
Papers by David Halprin
This is a comprehensive coverage of various forms of logic, which is carefully explained so that the reader(s) will be able to deal with everyday syllogisms and their use and frequent misuse.
Syllogisms occur in everyday conversations, often without realisation by the speaker(s) and/or listener(s).
There are 5 main categories and many sub-categories, however many of the papers involve overlapping topics.
Many papers are short poetic nods/homage to a particular poem of a variety of famous poets and they are located in the mathematics and physics groupings mainly.
Aldington (Richard) A Dream in the Luxembourg
Basho (Matsuo) and other Japanese poets re
Tankas and Haikus
Burns (Robert) Epitaph for James Smith
Gershwin (Ira) The Saga of Jenny
Howitt (Mary) The Spider and the Fly
Keats (John) Ode to a Grecian Urn
Khayyam (Omar) The Rubaiyat
Kipling (Rudyard) Gunga Din
Paterson (Banjo) The Man from Snowy River
Poe (Edgar Allan) The Raven
Shakespeare (William) Sonnet 18
Wilde (Oscar) To Milton
────────────────────────────
One of the citations of special interest in this paper from Progress in PhysicsVolume 14 (2018 ) is No.11 by Robert Oros di Bartini
On the Nature and Values of the Gravitational and Cosmological Constants-Anatoly V. Belyakov
Stable particles of the Universe — protons and electrons — are in constant motion, (there is a background component of their velocity), which is the source of the vacuum energy, explains the non-Newtonian vacuum potential and the curvature of space and determines the values of the gravitational and cosmological constants. This follows from the balance of interactions between a free electron and a proton, provided that there are no electrical forces and external influences.
This is the Bartini World, a collection of papers by Robert Oros di Bartini, collected from his archive by A.N.Maslov in 2009.
This English translation was made by PROMT, which did not use optical character recognition (OCR), but effected its translation directly from the PDF file by using artificial intelligence and hence is prone to may errors, and , in addition, omitted all scanned documants and consequently is only 86 pages.
Robert Oros di Bartini - Soviet aircraft designer, theoretical physicist, philosopher.Articles on physics and philosophy.Compiled by A.N. Maslov, M., “Self-education”, 2009, 224 pp.
Collection of articles on theoretical physics, cosmology and philosophy of the prominent Soviet aircraft designer R. di Bartini. In his physical works,
R. di Bartini sketched the theory of 6-dimensional quantized space-time and proposed a method for reducing basic physical quantities to space-time ones.
di Bartini's philosophical works were aimed at substantiating his physical concepts. Most articles are published for the first time.
The book is addressed to physicists, mathematicians, historians of science and technology, cultural experts, and everyone who is interested in
self-education.
David Halprin [email protected]
This is the Bartini World, a collection of papers by Robert Oros di Bartini, collected from his archive by A.N.Maslov in 2009.
This Russian language version includes many photographs and scanned hand-written documents and is 224 pages.
Robert Oros di Bartini - Soviet aircraft designer, theoretical physicist, philosopher.Articles on physics and philosophy.Compiled by A.N. Maslov, M., “Self-education”, 2009, 224 pp.
Collection of articles on theoretical physics, cosmology and philosophy of the prominent Soviet aircraft designer R. di Bartini. In his physical works,
R. di Bartini sketched the theory of 6-dimensional quantized space-time and proposed a method for reducing basic physical quantities to space-time ones.
di Bartini's philosophical works were aimed at substantiating his physical concepts. Most articles are published for the first time.
The book is addressed to physicists, mathematicians, historians of science and technology, cultural experts, and everyone who is interested in
self-education.
David Halprin [email protected]
Due to the wide variety of data necessary to explain the enigmatic title to this paper, there are three abstracts, graded to prepare the reader(s) for what ensues.
One may compare two things, which are utterly dissimilar, yet there is some commonality.
With respect to two seemingly different paradigms, this paper encompasses the revelations arising from making a comparison, which, at first, reveals a point in common, then a coincidental second one, then the emergence of a pattern leading to the inevitable conclusion of isometricity.
ABSTRACT-1
When a physicist theoretician attempts to formulate a paradigm to explain the existents and processes that constitute the physical universe, the most common approach is to base it on observations made by humans and their instruments.
This often leads to conjectures/hypotheses that may seem unacceptable to the layman, so it is promulgated amongst the academic fraternity and may gain increasing acceptance if there are no cognitive dissonances.
However, occasionally there is a physicist, who makes a different approach, whereby a paradigm is formulated that is either
1) partly speculative
or even
2) purely speculative,
and thereby meets with resistance from academic colleagues.
e.g. Albert Einstein
However, when deductions are made therefrom, that are able to account for observations, and as long as there are no errors detected, then it is acceptable.
e.g.1) Einstein's theories are those that are partly speculative.
e.g.2) However Robert Oros di Bartini `rocked' academia with such speculation that most of his colleagues laughed at him and said outright that it was a joke, resulting from a dare. Nevertheless his superb reputation as an aircraft designer for decades garnered him tacit support to the extent that Bruno Pontecorvo at the behest of
S.S. Gershtein read an edited version to the Russian Akademy.
di Bartini was pleased in one sense, but at the same time would have preferred it not to have been edited.
di Bartini's approach was via Combinatorial Topology, (a precursor to Algebraic Topology), and then Topological algebra), whereby he was able to elucidate some relations between physical quantities, to both the amazement and consternation of the academic fraternity.
Maybe it would have faded away but for a very astute Radio Engineer, (D.S.Kontorov), who `extracted' the nub of di Bartini's methodology in that a system of generalised dimensions was an essential tool for di Bartini. David Solomonovich Kontorov was able to adapt an appropriate system of dimensions for his paper (see copy on Academia.edu)
A Method of Making Systematic Investigations
Part 2, Radio Engineering Volume 35 1981
So others from the academic world seized on that and realised how powerful a tool it was. Eventually a succession of papers appeared advancing that concept from algebraic topology culminating in "Eleven New Laws of Conservation Expanding Physics for Global Strategic Management and Strategic Development", which are adaptable to real life situations, outside the realm of physics.
viz. Viva-di-bartini
Macrothink Institute, Business Management and Strategy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT-2
RELATIONS BETWEEN PHYSICAL CONSTANTS
(Translated from Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, Vol 163 No.4
pp 861/864 August 1965.)
INTRODUCTION
It is known that group-theoretical and topological methods may be used effectively in the explanation of physical problems. There are
well-known investigations about the discrete structural character of
space, and about the inter-connection between atomic and cosmological
values also.
However, the analytical connection between basic physical values has not been established, and these values have been determined
experimentally, as there is not such a theory, which can give a method for their theoretical determination.
In this work, a condensed exposition of the analytical connection between basic physical constants is given.
EXPLANATION
Much of di Bartini's paper makes use of a Generalised System of Dimensions, which is a novel approach. This concept so intrigued another Russian author (David Solomonovich Kontorov), that he adopted it in his paper on an entirely different subject with great success.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT-3
Over the millennia, there have been many paradigms explaining the physical universe both textually and mathematically, and for the most part, the mathematics has been founded/based on geometry and
trigonometry.
Cognitive differences have abounded, without resolution.
The Big Bang Theory and The Steady State theory, were the only two widely known contenders for the ultimate explanation of the truth and because of that, when the Steady State Theory was proven to be faulty, the Big bang was accepted universally throughout all academia, (in schools and universities, as well as astronomical societies etc.).
Notwithstanding the achievements of science with those assorted theories, their actual validity as being `quantum sufficit' was never proven.
Essentially we can get along quite well with the admixture of the assortment, knowing/believing full well that we cannot achieve a unified theory that encompasses them all.
e.g. Special Relativity, General Relativity and Quantum Theory cannot be merged into a Grand Unified Theory (GUT).
So although this paper does not purport to have the ultimate answer to the dilemma, it may go a long way towards that end.
This paper is based on the work of two independent scientists, who did neither know of the other's existence nor their publications,
however their theoretical researches, in essence, although presented in different mathematical languages (vernaculars), are identical.
A summary of their lives, background etc. follows:-
(Translated from Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, Vol 163 No.4
pp 861/864 August 1965. Omitted text from above translation was translated in Melbourne at the behest of, and cost to, David Halprin, taken from the original paper, in the book of the symposium on Gravitation.)
It is known that group-theoretical and topological methods may be used effectively in the explanation of physical problems. There are well-known investigations about the discrete structural character of the space, and about the inter-connection between atomic and cosmological values also.
However, the analytical connection between basic physical values has not been established, and these values have been determined experimentally, as there is not such a theory, which can give a method for their theoretical determination.
In this work, a condensed exposition of the analytical connection between basic physical constants is given.
Much of di Bartini's paper makes use of a Generalised System of Dimensions, which is a novel approach. This concept so intrigued another Russian author (David Solomonovich Kontorov), that he adopted it in his paper on an entirely different subject with great success.
When a physicist theoretician attempts to formulate a paradigm to explain the existents and processes that constitute the physical universe, the most common approach is to base it on observations made by humans and their instruments.
This often leads to conjectures/hypotheses that may seem unacceptable to the layman, so it is promulgated amongst the academic fraternity and may gain increasing acceptance if there are no cognitive dissonances.
However, occasionally there is a physicist, who makes a different approach, whereby a paradigm is formulated that is either
1) partly speculative or even
2) purely speculative,
and thereby meets with resistance from academic colleagues.
However, when deductions are made therefrom, that are able to account for observations, and as long as there are no errors detected, then it is acceptable.
e.g.1) Einstein's theories are those that are partly speculative.
e.g.2) However Robert Oros di Bartini `rocked' academia with such speculation that most of his colleagues laughed at him and said outright that it was a joke resulting from a dare. Nevertheless his superb reputation as an aircraft designer for decades garnered him tacit support to the extent that Bruno Pontecorvo at the behest of
S.S. Gershtein read an edited version to the Russian Akademy.
di Bartini was pleased in one sense, but at the same time would have preferred it not to have been edited.
di Bartini's approach was via Combinatorial Topology, (a precursor to Algebraic Topology), and it was able to elucidate some relations between physical quantities, to both the amazement and consternation of the academic fraternity.
Maybe it would have faded away but for a very astute Radio Engineer, who `extracted' the nub of di Bartini's methodology in that a system of generalised dimensions was an essential tool for di Bartini. David Solomonovich Kontorov was able to adapt an appropriate system of dimensions for his paper (see David Halprin's copy on Academia.edu)
A Method of Making Systematic Investigations
Part 2, Radio Engineering Volume 35 1981
So others from the academic world seized on that and realised how powerful a tool it was. Eventually a succession of papers appeared advancing that concept from algebraic topology culminating in "Eleven New Laws of Conservation Expanding Physics for Global Strategic Management and Strategic Development", which are adaptable to real life situations, outside the realm of physics.
viz. Viva-di-bartini
Macrothink Institute, Business Management and Strategy
ISSN 2157-6068 2020 Vol 11, No.1
REFERENCES
Viva Di Bartini: Eleven New Laws of Conservation
Expanding Physics for Global Strategic Management and Strategic Development.
Andrei G. Aleinikov (Corresponding author) [email protected]
David A. Smarsh [email protected]
International Academy of Genius
2231 Segundo Ct., Unit 2, Pleasanton, CA, 94588, USA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a comprehensive coverage of various forms of logic, which is carefully explained so that the reader(s) will be able to deal with everyday syllogisms and their use and frequent misuse.
Syllogisms occur in everyday conversations, often without realisation by the speaker(s) and/or listener(s).
There are 5 main categories and many sub-categories, however many of the papers involve overlapping topics.
Many papers are short poetic nods/homage to a particular poem of a variety of famous poets and they are located in the mathematics and physics groupings mainly.
Aldington (Richard) A Dream in the Luxembourg
Basho (Matsuo) and other Japanese poets re
Tankas and Haikus
Burns (Robert) Epitaph for James Smith
Gershwin (Ira) The Saga of Jenny
Howitt (Mary) The Spider and the Fly
Keats (John) Ode to a Grecian Urn
Khayyam (Omar) The Rubaiyat
Kipling (Rudyard) Gunga Din
Paterson (Banjo) The Man from Snowy River
Poe (Edgar Allan) The Raven
Shakespeare (William) Sonnet 18
Wilde (Oscar) To Milton
────────────────────────────
One of the citations of special interest in this paper from Progress in PhysicsVolume 14 (2018 ) is No.11 by Robert Oros di Bartini
On the Nature and Values of the Gravitational and Cosmological Constants-Anatoly V. Belyakov
Stable particles of the Universe — protons and electrons — are in constant motion, (there is a background component of their velocity), which is the source of the vacuum energy, explains the non-Newtonian vacuum potential and the curvature of space and determines the values of the gravitational and cosmological constants. This follows from the balance of interactions between a free electron and a proton, provided that there are no electrical forces and external influences.
This is the Bartini World, a collection of papers by Robert Oros di Bartini, collected from his archive by A.N.Maslov in 2009.
This English translation was made by PROMT, which did not use optical character recognition (OCR), but effected its translation directly from the PDF file by using artificial intelligence and hence is prone to may errors, and , in addition, omitted all scanned documants and consequently is only 86 pages.
Robert Oros di Bartini - Soviet aircraft designer, theoretical physicist, philosopher.Articles on physics and philosophy.Compiled by A.N. Maslov, M., “Self-education”, 2009, 224 pp.
Collection of articles on theoretical physics, cosmology and philosophy of the prominent Soviet aircraft designer R. di Bartini. In his physical works,
R. di Bartini sketched the theory of 6-dimensional quantized space-time and proposed a method for reducing basic physical quantities to space-time ones.
di Bartini's philosophical works were aimed at substantiating his physical concepts. Most articles are published for the first time.
The book is addressed to physicists, mathematicians, historians of science and technology, cultural experts, and everyone who is interested in
self-education.
David Halprin [email protected]
This is the Bartini World, a collection of papers by Robert Oros di Bartini, collected from his archive by A.N.Maslov in 2009.
This Russian language version includes many photographs and scanned hand-written documents and is 224 pages.
Robert Oros di Bartini - Soviet aircraft designer, theoretical physicist, philosopher.Articles on physics and philosophy.Compiled by A.N. Maslov, M., “Self-education”, 2009, 224 pp.
Collection of articles on theoretical physics, cosmology and philosophy of the prominent Soviet aircraft designer R. di Bartini. In his physical works,
R. di Bartini sketched the theory of 6-dimensional quantized space-time and proposed a method for reducing basic physical quantities to space-time ones.
di Bartini's philosophical works were aimed at substantiating his physical concepts. Most articles are published for the first time.
The book is addressed to physicists, mathematicians, historians of science and technology, cultural experts, and everyone who is interested in
self-education.
David Halprin [email protected]
Due to the wide variety of data necessary to explain the enigmatic title to this paper, there are three abstracts, graded to prepare the reader(s) for what ensues.
One may compare two things, which are utterly dissimilar, yet there is some commonality.
With respect to two seemingly different paradigms, this paper encompasses the revelations arising from making a comparison, which, at first, reveals a point in common, then a coincidental second one, then the emergence of a pattern leading to the inevitable conclusion of isometricity.
ABSTRACT-1
When a physicist theoretician attempts to formulate a paradigm to explain the existents and processes that constitute the physical universe, the most common approach is to base it on observations made by humans and their instruments.
This often leads to conjectures/hypotheses that may seem unacceptable to the layman, so it is promulgated amongst the academic fraternity and may gain increasing acceptance if there are no cognitive dissonances.
However, occasionally there is a physicist, who makes a different approach, whereby a paradigm is formulated that is either
1) partly speculative
or even
2) purely speculative,
and thereby meets with resistance from academic colleagues.
e.g. Albert Einstein
However, when deductions are made therefrom, that are able to account for observations, and as long as there are no errors detected, then it is acceptable.
e.g.1) Einstein's theories are those that are partly speculative.
e.g.2) However Robert Oros di Bartini `rocked' academia with such speculation that most of his colleagues laughed at him and said outright that it was a joke, resulting from a dare. Nevertheless his superb reputation as an aircraft designer for decades garnered him tacit support to the extent that Bruno Pontecorvo at the behest of
S.S. Gershtein read an edited version to the Russian Akademy.
di Bartini was pleased in one sense, but at the same time would have preferred it not to have been edited.
di Bartini's approach was via Combinatorial Topology, (a precursor to Algebraic Topology), and then Topological algebra), whereby he was able to elucidate some relations between physical quantities, to both the amazement and consternation of the academic fraternity.
Maybe it would have faded away but for a very astute Radio Engineer, (D.S.Kontorov), who `extracted' the nub of di Bartini's methodology in that a system of generalised dimensions was an essential tool for di Bartini. David Solomonovich Kontorov was able to adapt an appropriate system of dimensions for his paper (see copy on Academia.edu)
A Method of Making Systematic Investigations
Part 2, Radio Engineering Volume 35 1981
So others from the academic world seized on that and realised how powerful a tool it was. Eventually a succession of papers appeared advancing that concept from algebraic topology culminating in "Eleven New Laws of Conservation Expanding Physics for Global Strategic Management and Strategic Development", which are adaptable to real life situations, outside the realm of physics.
viz. Viva-di-bartini
Macrothink Institute, Business Management and Strategy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT-2
RELATIONS BETWEEN PHYSICAL CONSTANTS
(Translated from Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, Vol 163 No.4
pp 861/864 August 1965.)
INTRODUCTION
It is known that group-theoretical and topological methods may be used effectively in the explanation of physical problems. There are
well-known investigations about the discrete structural character of
space, and about the inter-connection between atomic and cosmological
values also.
However, the analytical connection between basic physical values has not been established, and these values have been determined
experimentally, as there is not such a theory, which can give a method for their theoretical determination.
In this work, a condensed exposition of the analytical connection between basic physical constants is given.
EXPLANATION
Much of di Bartini's paper makes use of a Generalised System of Dimensions, which is a novel approach. This concept so intrigued another Russian author (David Solomonovich Kontorov), that he adopted it in his paper on an entirely different subject with great success.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT-3
Over the millennia, there have been many paradigms explaining the physical universe both textually and mathematically, and for the most part, the mathematics has been founded/based on geometry and
trigonometry.
Cognitive differences have abounded, without resolution.
The Big Bang Theory and The Steady State theory, were the only two widely known contenders for the ultimate explanation of the truth and because of that, when the Steady State Theory was proven to be faulty, the Big bang was accepted universally throughout all academia, (in schools and universities, as well as astronomical societies etc.).
Notwithstanding the achievements of science with those assorted theories, their actual validity as being `quantum sufficit' was never proven.
Essentially we can get along quite well with the admixture of the assortment, knowing/believing full well that we cannot achieve a unified theory that encompasses them all.
e.g. Special Relativity, General Relativity and Quantum Theory cannot be merged into a Grand Unified Theory (GUT).
So although this paper does not purport to have the ultimate answer to the dilemma, it may go a long way towards that end.
This paper is based on the work of two independent scientists, who did neither know of the other's existence nor their publications,
however their theoretical researches, in essence, although presented in different mathematical languages (vernaculars), are identical.
A summary of their lives, background etc. follows:-
(Translated from Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, Vol 163 No.4
pp 861/864 August 1965. Omitted text from above translation was translated in Melbourne at the behest of, and cost to, David Halprin, taken from the original paper, in the book of the symposium on Gravitation.)
It is known that group-theoretical and topological methods may be used effectively in the explanation of physical problems. There are well-known investigations about the discrete structural character of the space, and about the inter-connection between atomic and cosmological values also.
However, the analytical connection between basic physical values has not been established, and these values have been determined experimentally, as there is not such a theory, which can give a method for their theoretical determination.
In this work, a condensed exposition of the analytical connection between basic physical constants is given.
Much of di Bartini's paper makes use of a Generalised System of Dimensions, which is a novel approach. This concept so intrigued another Russian author (David Solomonovich Kontorov), that he adopted it in his paper on an entirely different subject with great success.
When a physicist theoretician attempts to formulate a paradigm to explain the existents and processes that constitute the physical universe, the most common approach is to base it on observations made by humans and their instruments.
This often leads to conjectures/hypotheses that may seem unacceptable to the layman, so it is promulgated amongst the academic fraternity and may gain increasing acceptance if there are no cognitive dissonances.
However, occasionally there is a physicist, who makes a different approach, whereby a paradigm is formulated that is either
1) partly speculative or even
2) purely speculative,
and thereby meets with resistance from academic colleagues.
However, when deductions are made therefrom, that are able to account for observations, and as long as there are no errors detected, then it is acceptable.
e.g.1) Einstein's theories are those that are partly speculative.
e.g.2) However Robert Oros di Bartini `rocked' academia with such speculation that most of his colleagues laughed at him and said outright that it was a joke resulting from a dare. Nevertheless his superb reputation as an aircraft designer for decades garnered him tacit support to the extent that Bruno Pontecorvo at the behest of
S.S. Gershtein read an edited version to the Russian Akademy.
di Bartini was pleased in one sense, but at the same time would have preferred it not to have been edited.
di Bartini's approach was via Combinatorial Topology, (a precursor to Algebraic Topology), and it was able to elucidate some relations between physical quantities, to both the amazement and consternation of the academic fraternity.
Maybe it would have faded away but for a very astute Radio Engineer, who `extracted' the nub of di Bartini's methodology in that a system of generalised dimensions was an essential tool for di Bartini. David Solomonovich Kontorov was able to adapt an appropriate system of dimensions for his paper (see David Halprin's copy on Academia.edu)
A Method of Making Systematic Investigations
Part 2, Radio Engineering Volume 35 1981
So others from the academic world seized on that and realised how powerful a tool it was. Eventually a succession of papers appeared advancing that concept from algebraic topology culminating in "Eleven New Laws of Conservation Expanding Physics for Global Strategic Management and Strategic Development", which are adaptable to real life situations, outside the realm of physics.
viz. Viva-di-bartini
Macrothink Institute, Business Management and Strategy
ISSN 2157-6068 2020 Vol 11, No.1
REFERENCES
Viva Di Bartini: Eleven New Laws of Conservation
Expanding Physics for Global Strategic Management and Strategic Development.
Andrei G. Aleinikov (Corresponding author) [email protected]
David A. Smarsh [email protected]
International Academy of Genius
2231 Segundo Ct., Unit 2, Pleasanton, CA, 94588, USA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This paper contains many interrelated sections, most of which are complete. Those, that are incomplete, are `works-in-progress' and their updated versions are intended for appearance ASAP, hopefully weekly. This premature publication is due to the recent news broadcast of research findings (the black hole Sagittarius A and dark matter) of the Nobel prize winners Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel and Andrea Ghez. Their areas of research are also covered in this draft paper, and each reader has the opportunity to make his/her own personal discernment and/or judgement of the conclusions thereof. ────────────────────────────────────