Civil Procedure Review
Related Authors
Hermes Zaneti Jr
Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo
Fredie Didier Jr.
UFBA - Federal University of Bahia
Juliana Melazzi
UERJ - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University
André Batista Neves
UFBA - Federal University of Bahia
Antonio Cabral
UERJ - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University
Sofia Temer
UERJ - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University
Carolina Uzeda
Universidade Federal do Paraná
Carolina Meireles
UFBA - Federal University of Bahia
Tamyres Tavares de Lucena
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Uploads
Civil Procedure Review by Civil Procedure Review
millennialism, seen from the legal promises contained in the 1939, 1973 and 2015`s Motifs of the Brazilian Civil Procedure Codes. In this context legislative changes are presented as alternatives to the crises of the justice services through hope, as mystical trampolines of the collective imagination or even religious outbursts of collective imagination. The examination of the expositions elaborated predominantly by
Francisco Campos (1939), Alfredo Buzaid (1973) and Luiz Fux and the Commission of Jurists (2015), exposes a mystical faith of even religious outlines between the chaotic present of the revoked procedural law and the promised paradisiac future by the new procedural standard. This vision can be associated with the Principle of Hope, utopian thinking as a political and social promise through Civil Procedural Law that offers legal means and techniques capable of solving the obstacles of the Brazilian Justice.
will be eligible for resources and the purpose of this study is to discuss the conduct of this exceptional impugnable of decision in which the legal theory is applied and the need of systematization of their impacts.
of evidence and this essay which provides a framework for further research gives a particularly and critic point of view influenced by a vision of the process as an instrument of freedom or as a right that point to protect freedoms.
This commitment action, regarding a remedy of specific performance actually provided in the Code of the Administrative Process (Legislative Decree No 104/2010), cannot be brought autonomously because it has to be accompanied by another main action for annulment.