
Chirag Balyan
.
less
Related Authors
Pietro Ortolani
Radboud University Nijmegen
Tony Cole
University of Leicester
Barbara Warwas
The Hague University of Applied Sciences
Jürgen Basedow
Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law
Misión Jurídica
UNIVERSIDAD COLEGIO MAYOR DE CUNDINAMARCA
Emre Esen
Istanbul University
Shahla Ali
The University of Hong Kong
Lorenzo Sasso
Moscow state institute of international relations
Uploads
Papers by Chirag Balyan
(NDPS Act, for brevity) has created strict liability offences.1 Section
37 of the Act provides that NDPS cases are cognizable and nonbailable.
A person who allegedly commits any offence under the
Act has to undergo incarceration till the end of a trial and chances
of getting out on a bail are meager. Arrest of a person who has
been falsely implicated or wrongly accused is therefore, a serious
curtailment onthe due process protection. Section 50 of the Act
therefore, provides a safeguard to the suspect person by allowing
to ask for a ‘personal search’ in presence of a magistrate or a
gazetted officer. The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of
India in cases of State of Punjab v.Baldev Singh2,and Vijay
SinghChandubhaJadejav. State of Gujarat3,has
replaced‘substantial compliance’ theory with the ‘strict or
complete compliance’, so that non-compliance means acquittal.
However, the scope of the term ‘personal search’ has been
liberally4 and literally5 interpreted by the Supreme Court. Those
having ‘restrictive approach’ which is also a commonly followed
approach in such cases argues that the personal search means ...
Court of Justice, Family Division rendered a path breaking
judgment by allowing a 14-year-old minor girl, suffering from
cancer, to be cryogenically preserved, as per her wish, after
death.1 The judgment opened up plethora of questions pertaining
to cryonics which range from issue of burial, rights of the dead,
rights after revival of dead and the legal consequences thereof. In
this paper an attempt has been made to understand the meaning
of cryonics, status and disposal of dead body, definition of death
and legal dynamics of cryogenic preservation in India & other
jurisdictions.
Books by Chirag Balyan
(NDPS Act, for brevity) has created strict liability offences.1 Section
37 of the Act provides that NDPS cases are cognizable and nonbailable.
A person who allegedly commits any offence under the
Act has to undergo incarceration till the end of a trial and chances
of getting out on a bail are meager. Arrest of a person who has
been falsely implicated or wrongly accused is therefore, a serious
curtailment onthe due process protection. Section 50 of the Act
therefore, provides a safeguard to the suspect person by allowing
to ask for a ‘personal search’ in presence of a magistrate or a
gazetted officer. The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of
India in cases of State of Punjab v.Baldev Singh2,and Vijay
SinghChandubhaJadejav. State of Gujarat3,has
replaced‘substantial compliance’ theory with the ‘strict or
complete compliance’, so that non-compliance means acquittal.
However, the scope of the term ‘personal search’ has been
liberally4 and literally5 interpreted by the Supreme Court. Those
having ‘restrictive approach’ which is also a commonly followed
approach in such cases argues that the personal search means ...
Court of Justice, Family Division rendered a path breaking
judgment by allowing a 14-year-old minor girl, suffering from
cancer, to be cryogenically preserved, as per her wish, after
death.1 The judgment opened up plethora of questions pertaining
to cryonics which range from issue of burial, rights of the dead,
rights after revival of dead and the legal consequences thereof. In
this paper an attempt has been made to understand the meaning
of cryonics, status and disposal of dead body, definition of death
and legal dynamics of cryogenic preservation in India & other
jurisdictions.