
Anis Pervez
PhD. in Mass Communication, Dhaka University, 2016
Specialist in Information Science (SpLIS), Indiana University, Bloomington, 2008
Cand.sociol, Oslo University, 1993
Specialist in Information Science (SpLIS), Indiana University, Bloomington, 2008
Cand.sociol, Oslo University, 1993
less
Related Authors
Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos
University of Westminster
Bill Bowring
Birkbeck College, University of London
Aaron Gerow
Yale University
Javier Díaz Noci
Pompeu Fabra University
Murat Akser
University of Ulster
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Cor Baerveldt
University of Alberta
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Bruce Clarke
Texas Tech University
Carlos A. Scolari
Pompeu Fabra University
InterestsView All (9)
Uploads
Papers by Anis Pervez
This transdisciplinary approach draws on autopoiesis, laws of form, reader response and cybernetic communication. The research employs a constructivist approach to understand how viewers assign meaning to the films they watch. The research is based on two premises: information emerges from people’s indications of an environment as they observe it, and film is an environment for observation that attains meaning, in other words become informative as spectators make indications of their observations of film.
Rashomon, the celebrated film of Akira Kurosawa, is the vehicle to understand the process of sense-making as constructing form. Viewers’ comments at Amazon.com provide evidence of how these individuals observe the film and make sense of it by making distinctions. A reader-response analysis was used to interpret the comments; this researcher’s analysis is yet a higher scale of indication of observation.
In the process of reader-response, the researcher as an observer is cued or perturbed to indicate that Rashomon, an impressionistic film noted for its cinematic style, has taken an expressionist form because of the discourse constructed, and being constructed, by various observers generating meaning over an open-ended palette.
This research stresses the functional necessity for transcending disciplinary borders in order to understand communication as multistage observation constructing meaning and thereby constantly generating forms for observation. Such forms are made intelligible by virtue of our having structural coupling, i.e. a shared set of tokens such as language. Humans as observers are constant producers of forms and diligent generators of tokens that expand our horizon.
Communication is thus an ever-emerging, meaning-construction process. We observe the world—tangible and intangible—that we interpret, make distinctions, and externalize through indication; these are in turn observed, distinguished, and indicated by other observers. This observational understanding of communication in fact facilitates the unending emergence of horizon and therefore communication is emergent, sense-making, and horizon-expanding.