
Adrian Donoso
Related Authors
Na'ama Pat-El
The University of Texas at Austin
Michael MacNeil
Carleton University
Yaman Akdeniz
Istanbul Bilgi University
Eitan Grossman
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Martin Haspelmath
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Mauro Grondona
University of Genova
Nicola Lupo
LUISS Guido Carli
Ken Pennington
The Catholic University of America
Guillermo Avila
Fundar Centro de Análisi e investigación A.C
Rodrigo G de Azevedo
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Uploads
Papers by Adrian Donoso
We will investigate further the most accurate concepts of the aforementioned crimes as well as how the principle of proportionality is interpreted in the two legal systems and in the doctrine in general.
In chapter number I on the approach of the problem where we will draw up the general objective and the specific objectives, and thus be able to start from a more specific investigative point which will indicate what is the appropriate procedure for the application of penalties in cases of crimes of bribery, concussion and peculation.
In chapter number II we will cite the most accurate definitions of highly studied jurists on the subject of research, this is how we can clarify the most common unknowns on which it is based and how it is regulated in the laws of the two countries studied, likewise In this way we will look for the closest definitions that best apply to the research topic, as well as the definition of the proportionality principle and how this is applied in the legal system of Ecuador and Peru.
In Chapter III we define our form of research using paradigms, sources of research, research methods, etc. These will help us make the research effective and deliver the expected results.
Later in chapter IV we analyze in a comparison the penalties of the two countries studied in order to establish differences and similarities between the laws.
In Chapter V we study the criminal procedures of the two countries in order to establish similarities and differences between countries in the same way as the previous chapter in order to establish changes or denote which system is more effective.
In the last Chapter of this investigation we will establish the conclusions and recommendations as a result of this investigation.
We will investigate further the most accurate concepts of the aforementioned crimes as well as how the principle of proportionality is interpreted in the two legal systems and in the doctrine in general.
In chapter number I on the approach of the problem where we will draw up the general objective and the specific objectives, and thus be able to start from a more specific investigative point which will indicate what is the appropriate procedure for the application of penalties in cases of crimes of bribery, concussion and peculation.
In chapter number II we will cite the most accurate definitions of highly studied jurists on the subject of research, this is how we can clarify the most common unknowns on which it is based and how it is regulated in the laws of the two countries studied, likewise In this way we will look for the closest definitions that best apply to the research topic, as well as the definition of the proportionality principle and how this is applied in the legal system of Ecuador and Peru.
In Chapter III we define our form of research using paradigms, sources of research, research methods, etc. These will help us make the research effective and deliver the expected results.
Later in chapter IV we analyze in a comparison the penalties of the two countries studied in order to establish differences and similarities between the laws.
In Chapter V we study the criminal procedures of the two countries in order to establish similarities and differences between countries in the same way as the previous chapter in order to establish changes or denote which system is more effective.
In the last Chapter of this investigation we will establish the conclusions and recommendations as a result of this investigation.