
Yair Galily
I am deeply passionate about understanding human behavior and using that knowledge to help others thrive. Throughout my career, I've honed my ability to guide teams and individuals through challenges, empowering them to perform at their best, even in high-pressure situations. My approach blends practical insights with psychological expertise, allowing me to create environments where resilience, motivation, and success can flourish.
One of my key strengths is making complex concepts easy to understand and apply. I pride myself on being a collaborative partner, always striving to bring people together and foster open communication. Problem-solving is something I approach with both creativity and strategy, ensuring that I’m able to adapt to changing situations while maintaining focus on the larger goal.
I'm also someone who believes in constant growth and innovation. I’m always looking for new ways to push boundaries and explore fresh approaches, which I balance with a commitment to learning from every experience. I find great satisfaction in discovering solutions that are both effective and forward-thinking.
Empathy plays a central role in how I work. I take the time to understand each person’s unique perspective and needs, ensuring that everyone feels valued and supported. Building strong relationships and creating inclusive, cohesive teams is a priority for me, and I believe it’s essential for achieving success together.
In everything I do, I bring a passion for excellence, a commitment to learning, and a desire to make a meaningful impact. I look forward to new opportunities where I can continue to grow, contribute, and help others do the same.
One of my key strengths is making complex concepts easy to understand and apply. I pride myself on being a collaborative partner, always striving to bring people together and foster open communication. Problem-solving is something I approach with both creativity and strategy, ensuring that I’m able to adapt to changing situations while maintaining focus on the larger goal.
I'm also someone who believes in constant growth and innovation. I’m always looking for new ways to push boundaries and explore fresh approaches, which I balance with a commitment to learning from every experience. I find great satisfaction in discovering solutions that are both effective and forward-thinking.
Empathy plays a central role in how I work. I take the time to understand each person’s unique perspective and needs, ensuring that everyone feels valued and supported. Building strong relationships and creating inclusive, cohesive teams is a priority for me, and I believe it’s essential for achieving success together.
In everything I do, I bring a passion for excellence, a commitment to learning, and a desire to make a meaningful impact. I look forward to new opportunities where I can continue to grow, contribute, and help others do the same.
less
Related Authors
Raphael Cohen-Almagor
University of Hull
Menachem Mautner
Tel Aviv University
שאול שארף
Peres Academic Center
Nurit Alfasi
Ben Gurion University of the Negev
Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov
Bar-Ilan University
ruth burstein
David Yellin College of Education
Michael Birnhack
Tel Aviv University
Uploads
Papers by Yair Galily
עמנואל קאנט והמקרה של מערכת שיפוט בעזרת וידאו (VAR) בכדורגל
judgments, grounded in professional knowledge and expertise.
However, much of the research on referees’ decision-making has
traditionally focused on the concept of “bias” in their judgments.
This review shifts attention to referees’ decision-making noise –
defined as “undesirable variability in judgments of the same
problem” (Kahneman, D., Sibony, O., & Sunstein, C. R. [2021].
Noise: A flaw in human judgment (p. 40). Little, Brown Spark).
Noise reflects the inconsistency in referees’ responses to similar
match situations, resulting in diverse decisions for comparable
infringements. The article is structured into five key sections. First,
we introduce the concept of noise in human judgment. Second,
we explore the issue of noise in the context of football
refereeing, offering examples and relevant data. Particular
emphasis is placed on noise in foul decisions, incorporating both
raw data and findings from existing literature. A detailed
framework is presented, outlining the components, sources,
detection methods, and strategies for reducing judgment noise in
refereeing. In the third section, we compare bias and noise in
football officiating, examining potential mechanisms underlying
each. The fourth section considers strategies for reducing errors
in refereeing and discusses the potential costs associated with
implementing such measures. Finally, we argue why stakeholders
in football officiating should expand their focus beyond bias to
address the implications of noise in refereeing decisions.
עמנואל קאנט והמקרה של מערכת שיפוט בעזרת וידאו (VAR) בכדורגל
judgments, grounded in professional knowledge and expertise.
However, much of the research on referees’ decision-making has
traditionally focused on the concept of “bias” in their judgments.
This review shifts attention to referees’ decision-making noise –
defined as “undesirable variability in judgments of the same
problem” (Kahneman, D., Sibony, O., & Sunstein, C. R. [2021].
Noise: A flaw in human judgment (p. 40). Little, Brown Spark).
Noise reflects the inconsistency in referees’ responses to similar
match situations, resulting in diverse decisions for comparable
infringements. The article is structured into five key sections. First,
we introduce the concept of noise in human judgment. Second,
we explore the issue of noise in the context of football
refereeing, offering examples and relevant data. Particular
emphasis is placed on noise in foul decisions, incorporating both
raw data and findings from existing literature. A detailed
framework is presented, outlining the components, sources,
detection methods, and strategies for reducing judgment noise in
refereeing. In the third section, we compare bias and noise in
football officiating, examining potential mechanisms underlying
each. The fourth section considers strategies for reducing errors
in refereeing and discusses the potential costs associated with
implementing such measures. Finally, we argue why stakeholders
in football officiating should expand their focus beyond bias to
address the implications of noise in refereeing decisions.