
György Lengyel
Related Authors
Dimitrij Mlekuz Vrhovnik
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts
Nerissa Russell
Cornell University
Tristan Carter
McMaster University
Jayjit Majumdar
University of Kalyani
Kristen J Gremillion
Ohio State University
Richard Menary
Macquarie University
Ellery Frahm
Yale University
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Marta Diaz-Guardamino
Durham University
Iain Davidson
University of New England - Australia
InterestsView All (38)
Uploads
Papers by György Lengyel
Ősrégészeti szempontból nemzetközileg is számontartott lelőhely, mivel az Európába 40 ezer évvel ezelőtt érkező anatómiailag modern ember (Homo sapiens) egyik legidősebb megtelepedése található itt. A lelőhely régészeti jelentősége megkívánja, hogy a legújabb kutatási módszerekkel újravizsgáljuk az emberi megtelepedéseket, ami lehetőséget ad számos aktuális kérdés tisztázására.
https://authors.elsevier.com/c/1ZpsA-4PRtyV6
This paper compares lithic and faunal assemblages from Milovice (Czech Republic) and Kraków Spadzista (Poland) archaeological sites, with the aim of reconstructing temporal variations and patterning in Gravettian hunting of Mammuthus primigenius (woolly mammoth) in Central Europe. Milovice I was occupied ∼1 ky earlier than Kraków Spadzista, and is contemporaneous with Willendorf-Kostienkan sites. It is dated between 30.1 and 29.2 ka cal BP, overlapping the end of the GS 5.1 stadial in the Greenland ice core paleoclimatic record; the site was formed during cold climatic conditions. Radiocarbon dates from Kraków Spadzista indicate the site was occupied between 28.6 and 27 ka cal BP, spanning periods of significant climate instability through the GI 4 interstadial, GS 4 stadial, and the short interstadial GI 3. The two sites have fundamental differences in armature tool kits, such as raw materials and tool sizes. The hunter-gatherers at both sites had a mammoth-hunting focus, although they used different sized lithic weapon tips for hunting and thus probably had different strategies for procuring prey. The mammoth mortality profiles are significantly different at the two sites. At Milovice I, mid-life adults dominate the profile, while juveniles greatly dominate at Kraków Spadzista. We suggest that climatically mediated differences in mammoth migratory behavior, feeding behavior, population sizes, and demography influenced Gravettian people to manufacture and use different sizes of projectile points and to significantly increase the number of tool types during the most climatically unstable periods; these changes reflected tactical changes in Late Gravettian subsistence hunting in East-Central Europe.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This paper is a comment on: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018217308040
The reply to our comment is: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018217311094
The Natufian culture (c. 15–11.5 ka cal BP) marks a pivotal step in the transition from hunting and gathering to sedentism and farming in the Near East. Although conventionally divided into Early and Late phases, this internal chronology lacks support from reliable absolute dates. This is now addressed by new AMS dating from two neighbouring Natufian sites at Mount Carmel in Israel: Raqefet Cave, conventionally assigned to the Late phase of the Natufian; and el-Wad Terrace, spanning the entire Natufian sequence. Results indicate that these two sites were in fact contemporaneous at some point, but with distinct lunate assemblages. Distinguishing between Natufian phases is, therefore, more complex than previously thought; the social implications of diverse but co-existing cultural manifestations must be considered in any future reconstruction of the Natufian.
Ősrégészeti szempontból nemzetközileg is számontartott lelőhely, mivel az Európába 40 ezer évvel ezelőtt érkező anatómiailag modern ember (Homo sapiens) egyik legidősebb megtelepedése található itt. A lelőhely régészeti jelentősége megkívánja, hogy a legújabb kutatási módszerekkel újravizsgáljuk az emberi megtelepedéseket, ami lehetőséget ad számos aktuális kérdés tisztázására.
https://authors.elsevier.com/c/1ZpsA-4PRtyV6
This paper compares lithic and faunal assemblages from Milovice (Czech Republic) and Kraków Spadzista (Poland) archaeological sites, with the aim of reconstructing temporal variations and patterning in Gravettian hunting of Mammuthus primigenius (woolly mammoth) in Central Europe. Milovice I was occupied ∼1 ky earlier than Kraków Spadzista, and is contemporaneous with Willendorf-Kostienkan sites. It is dated between 30.1 and 29.2 ka cal BP, overlapping the end of the GS 5.1 stadial in the Greenland ice core paleoclimatic record; the site was formed during cold climatic conditions. Radiocarbon dates from Kraków Spadzista indicate the site was occupied between 28.6 and 27 ka cal BP, spanning periods of significant climate instability through the GI 4 interstadial, GS 4 stadial, and the short interstadial GI 3. The two sites have fundamental differences in armature tool kits, such as raw materials and tool sizes. The hunter-gatherers at both sites had a mammoth-hunting focus, although they used different sized lithic weapon tips for hunting and thus probably had different strategies for procuring prey. The mammoth mortality profiles are significantly different at the two sites. At Milovice I, mid-life adults dominate the profile, while juveniles greatly dominate at Kraków Spadzista. We suggest that climatically mediated differences in mammoth migratory behavior, feeding behavior, population sizes, and demography influenced Gravettian people to manufacture and use different sizes of projectile points and to significantly increase the number of tool types during the most climatically unstable periods; these changes reflected tactical changes in Late Gravettian subsistence hunting in East-Central Europe.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This paper is a comment on: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018217308040
The reply to our comment is: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018217311094
The Natufian culture (c. 15–11.5 ka cal BP) marks a pivotal step in the transition from hunting and gathering to sedentism and farming in the Near East. Although conventionally divided into Early and Late phases, this internal chronology lacks support from reliable absolute dates. This is now addressed by new AMS dating from two neighbouring Natufian sites at Mount Carmel in Israel: Raqefet Cave, conventionally assigned to the Late phase of the Natufian; and el-Wad Terrace, spanning the entire Natufian sequence. Results indicate that these two sites were in fact contemporaneous at some point, but with distinct lunate assemblages. Distinguishing between Natufian phases is, therefore, more complex than previously thought; the social implications of diverse but co-existing cultural manifestations must be considered in any future reconstruction of the Natufian.
presentations of new results or syntheses on the time period ~30,000 to 15,000 years ago.
Registration to the conference:
http://wogh2019.isez.pan.krakow.pl/form.php
Please send the abstracts to Poitr Woital [email protected] . The online payment option will be ready soon.
At the upcoming UISPP 18th World Congress, Paris 4-9 June 2018, session XVII-4 (The Upper Palaeolithic research in Central and Eastern Europe) welcomes oral presentations and posters that focus on the understanding the diversity of the UP archaeological record in Central and Eastern Europe through the lenses of lithic analysis, absolute dating, isotopic studies and zooarchaeology, and all fields of Palaeolithic archaeology. Please find further details in the session abstract book:
https://uispp2018.sciencesconf.org/data/pages/sessions_UISPP_congres_Paris_15_06_2017_livret_des_sessions_1.pdf
Proposals for communication have to be submitted until 30 November 2017 on the web of UISPP https://uispp2018.sciencesconf.org/
The organizers of UISPP restricted the number of oral communications, therefore maximum 10 presentations can be held. The length of a presentation is max 20 min. However, the regulations do not limit the number of posters and allow 5 min to present each. Posters also will be available on the web.
The sessions can be published at Archaeopress with online free distribution on their website (according to UISPP organizers). Also, there is a possibility to publish the talks and the posters in journals (we would like to discuss this at the conference with the participants of the session). We would like to emphasize that in our session posters weigh the same as talks and we encourage poster authors to publish their posters as a paper.
A bursary system will be set up to support certain researchers who would not have the possibility to participate without it, but the bursary system concerning who can apply has not been clarified by UISPP yet.
If you have any question, please do not hesitate to contact us at [email protected](György Lengyel) or [email protected] (Jarosław Wilczyński).
Session abstract
The development of the Upper Palaeolithic (between 40 ka and 10 ka uncalibrated radiocarbon ages before present) in Central and Eastern Europe significantly differs from that of Western Europe. The difference started already with the Middle-to-Upper Palaeolithic transition and remains pronounced throughout the whole Upper Palaeolithic, as shown by the anomalies in the succession of the archaeological cultures. Recent research projects in Central and Eastern Europe have brought new results to the understanding of the Upper Palaeolithic hunter-gatherer archaeological remains. Our aim with this session is to call for papers focusing on the understanding of the principles and variants of human subsistence strategies and the roots of archaeological cultural variability through the lenses of lithic analysis, absolute dating, isotopic studies and zooarchaeology, and all fields of Palaeolithic archaeology, which may explain the diversity of the archaeological record. We also welcome papers that discuss and explain differences between Western, Central, and Eastern Europe with the same scope. We hope to advance sharing and discussing new results and methods from the Upper Palaeolithic of Central and Eastern Europe, which eventually contribute to the understanding of Eurasian Palaeolithic human cultural assortment. The papers presented in the session are preferred to be published as a special volume of a peer-reviewed journal.