
Naresh Kumar
Assistant Professor, Political Science
less
Related Authors
Jeroen Warner
Wageningen University
Sierra Gladfelter
University of Colorado, Boulder
Nimmi Kurian
Centre for Policy Research
Saurabh Thakur
Jawaharlal Nehru University
Semion Polinov
University of Haifa
Nitin Agarwala
Cochin University of Science and Technology
santosh nepal
ICIMOD
InterestsView All (7)
Uploads
Papers by Naresh Kumar
maritime route connecting the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and as sources of
natural resources. The renewed interest in the Northeast Passage or the
Northern Sea Route is fueled by a recession of Arctic sea ice coupled with the
discovery of new natural resources at a time when emerging and global markets
are in growing demand for them. Driven by the expectation of potential future
economic importance of the region, political interest and governance has been
rapidly developing, mostly within the Arctic Council. However, this paper
argues that optimism regarding the potential of Arctic routes as an alternative to
the Suez Canal is overstated. The route involves many challenges: jurisdictional
disputes create political uncertainties; shallow waters limit ship size; lack of
modern deepwater ports and search and rescue (SAR) capabilities requires ships
to have higher standards of autonomy and safety; harsh weather conditions and
free-floating ice make navigation more difficult and schedules more variable;
and more expensive ship construction and operation costs lessen the economic
viability of the route. Technological advances and infrastructure investments
may ameliorate navigational challenges, enabling increased shipping of natural
resources from the Arctic to global markets.
maritime route connecting the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and as sources of
natural resources. The renewed interest in the Northeast Passage or the
Northern Sea Route is fueled by a recession of Arctic sea ice coupled with the
discovery of new natural resources at a time when emerging and global markets
are in growing demand for them. Driven by the expectation of potential future
economic importance of the region, political interest and governance has been
rapidly developing, mostly within the Arctic Council. However, this paper
argues that optimism regarding the potential of Arctic routes as an alternative to
the Suez Canal is overstated. The route involves many challenges: jurisdictional
disputes create political uncertainties; shallow waters limit ship size; lack of
modern deepwater ports and search and rescue (SAR) capabilities requires ships
to have higher standards of autonomy and safety; harsh weather conditions and
free-floating ice make navigation more difficult and schedules more variable;
and more expensive ship construction and operation costs lessen the economic
viability of the route. Technological advances and infrastructure investments
may ameliorate navigational challenges, enabling increased shipping of natural
resources from the Arctic to global markets.