
Peeter Vihma
I am a recipient of a 4-year grant to complete my PhD studies at University of Helsinki. My research at the Social Sciences Doctoral School is focused on governance networks where my special interest lies in the dynamic and temporal aspects of network relations. I have a good experience in applying qualitative methods (including visual methods) but lately have made more use of network data analysis. Besides academic and applied research I make documentary films, consult and lead civil society initiatives.
less
Related Authors
Darya Litvina
State University Higher School of Economics (St Petersburg)
Maren Hartmann
Universität der Künste Berlin / University of the Arts Berlin
Maria Kyriakidou
University of East Anglia
Gabriel Alberto Moreno Esparza
Northumbria University
Marius Ioan Tatar
University of Oradea
Matthias De Groof
University of Amsterdam
Nico Carpentier
Charles University, Prague
InterestsView All (21)
Uploads
Papers by Peeter Vihma
Estonian forest policy, conflicts over regulations escalated to an unprecedented
extent in 2017. We analyze the institutional design and process of collaborative governance in this area in order to understand the reasons behind the failure of this governance arrangement. Our empirical analysis is based on a mixed methods approach
combining network analysis with qualitative analysis of interview data. Our analysis
reveals that the collaborative institutions were unable to generate shared understanding
of the mission and the ground rules of decision-making, provided uneven
facilitation, failed to build trust, and thus were unable to establish an arena conducive
to learning. We further stress the role of network methods in capturing adequate
information from an institutional setting involving multiple participants.
Books by Peeter Vihma
Estonian forest policy, conflicts over regulations escalated to an unprecedented
extent in 2017. We analyze the institutional design and process of collaborative governance in this area in order to understand the reasons behind the failure of this governance arrangement. Our empirical analysis is based on a mixed methods approach
combining network analysis with qualitative analysis of interview data. Our analysis
reveals that the collaborative institutions were unable to generate shared understanding
of the mission and the ground rules of decision-making, provided uneven
facilitation, failed to build trust, and thus were unable to establish an arena conducive
to learning. We further stress the role of network methods in capturing adequate
information from an institutional setting involving multiple participants.