
Candace Fujikane
In this era of late liberal settler colonialism, cartography as a methodology is critical to rearticulating our radically contingent relationships with the living lands, seas, and skies. Capital fears abundance because it must manufacture the perception of scarcity to generate markets. By contrast, mapping abundance is an urgent insistence on life in the face of corporate-induced climate change. The struggle for a planetary future calls for a profound epistemological shift. Indigenous ancestral knowledges are now providing a foundation for movements against climate change, one based on Indigenous economies of abundance as opposed to capitalist economies of scarcity. As settler colonial cartographies map thresholds between life and nonlife in ways that have devastating effects for the planet, these exhausted cartographies of capital are being transformed by the cartographies of Kanaka Maoli and settler ally artists, writers, and activists who map abundance, knowing that restorative changes have exponential effects. In this way, mapping abundance refuses to succumb to capital’s logic that we have passed an apocalyptic threshold of no return. Vital to decolonial futures is the Kanaka Maoli art of kilo as it is practiced at restoration projects in Hawaiʻi at taro pondfields, fishponds, and waterways. Kilo is the intergenerational observation of the elemental forms, recording the laws of these forms in moʻolelo (storied history), oli (chants) and mele (song). Kilo cultivates a decolonial love for lands, seas and skies that transforms climate events into renewed possibilities for abundance. My writing and research engage synchronic sets of practices: those that challenge the operations of the US occupying/settler state, and those that enact a future beyond it. Praxis is a critical part of my research, and I am actively involved in land struggles against urban and industrial development of Kanaka ‘Ōiwi sacred and storied places in Lualualei Valley, Waiāhole, Kalihi and Mauna Kea, as well as in other places where people live their vision of an independent and sustainable Hawai‘i. I have co-edited with Jonathan Okamura Asian Settler Colonialism: From Local Governance to the Habits of Everyday Life in Hawai‘i (University of Hawai‘i Press, 2008). In this collection of essays, Native Hawaiian and settler contributors examine Asian settler colonialism as a constellation of the colonial ideologies and practices of Asian Americans as settlers who currently support the broader structure of the U.S. settler state. Premised on a critical distinction between Hawaiians, who have a genealogical connection to land in Hawai‘i, and non-Hawaiians, who are settlers whose genealogical ties lie elsewhere, the contributors examine Asian settler colonialism in essays ranging from analyses of Japanese, Korean, and Filipino settlement to accounts of Asian settler practices in the legislature, the prison industrial complex, and the U.S. military to critiques of Asian settlers’ representations of Hawai‘i in literature and the visual arts. My book, Mapping Abundance for a Planetary Future: Kanaka Maoli and Critical Settler Cartographies in Hawaiʻi, is forthcoming form Duke University Press in 2021.
Phone: 808-956-7810
Address: English Department
1733 Donaghho Road
Honolulu, HI 96822
Phone: 808-956-7810
Address: English Department
1733 Donaghho Road
Honolulu, HI 96822
less
Related Authors
Iokepa Casumbal-Salazar
University of California, Santa Cruz
Noelani Goodyear-Ka'opua
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Jamaica Osorio
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Vincenzo Bavaro
Università Degli Studi di Napoli "L'Orientale"
Uahikea Maile
University of Toronto
Karin Louise Hermes
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Kahikina de Silva
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Emalani Case
Victoria University of Wellington
Kim Compoc
University of Hawaii West Oahu
InterestsView All (46)
Uploads
Books by Candace Fujikane
Papers by Candace Fujikane
While the 2005 re-branding tactic is ostensibly about the marketing of Israel in a global economy, color washings as public relations campaigns have sought to redirect international attention away from the brutalities of Israeli occupation, apartheid, and state racism, the Palestinian uprising in the Second Intifada, and the historic 2004 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that the Israeli Separation Barrier / Apartheid Wall violates international law and Palestinian human rights. Color washings work in the service of normalization to conceal evidence of Israel’s apartheid operations, such as its ongoing construction of the Apartheid Wall through which Israel is moving to annex 46% of the West Bank, separating Palestinians from water resources, food, farms, jobs, schools and healthcare, limiting their mobility, and isolating Palestinians from each other. We can track the yellowwashing of Israel in the ways that the state of Israel and American Zionist lobbyists have produced and circulated a narrative of Israeli alliances with Asian Americans through the figure of U.S. Senator Daniel Inouye.
In this essay, I trace the circuits of yellowwashing narratives representing U.S. aid to Israel through the historical figure and substance of Inouye. Through a critical analysis of such yellowwashing, I argue that the work that many of us have done concerning the intersection of settler colonial studies and indigenous studies in Hawaiʻi is particularly useful in considering articulations of the US settler state with the Israeli settler state and the ways they are mutually constitutive. I also argue that this yellowwashing of Israel opens up another dimension to these color washings: as Israel circulated the figure of Inouye, the substance of Inouye’s actions accentuates the ways that US settler colonialism is constitutive of Inouye’s positionality as a Japanese American. I then foreground what has been erased in these displacements: Palestinian political agency under deadly Israeli assault. In contrast to the state-sponsored color washings of Israel, the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction (BDS) movement has enabled broader alliances in an international movement to end Israeli apartheid.
In this essay, I consider the naming of an Israeli missile facility after Hawai'i U.S. Senator Daniel Inouye, and I trace the circuits of yellowwashing narratives representing U.S. aid to Israel through the historical figure and substance of Inouye, Through a critical analysis of such yellowwashing, I consider the articulations of the US settler state with the Israeli settler state and the ways they are mutually constitutive. I also argue that this yellowwashing of Israel opens up another dimension to these color washings: as Israel circulated the figure of Inouye, the substance of Inouye’s actions make evident the ways that US settler colonialism is constitutive of Inouye’s positionality as a Japanese American. I then foreground what has been erased in these displacements: Palestinian political agency under deadly Israeli assault. In contrast to the state-sponsored color washings of Israel, the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction (BDS) movement has enabled broader alliances in an international movement to end Israeli apartheid.
While the 2005 re-branding tactic is ostensibly about the marketing of Israel in a global economy, color washings as public relations campaigns have sought to redirect international attention away from the brutalities of Israeli occupation, apartheid, and state racism, the Palestinian uprising in the Second Intifada, and the historic 2004 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that the Israeli Separation Barrier / Apartheid Wall violates international law and Palestinian human rights. Color washings work in the service of normalization to conceal evidence of Israel’s apartheid operations, such as its ongoing construction of the Apartheid Wall through which Israel is moving to annex 46% of the West Bank, separating Palestinians from water resources, food, farms, jobs, schools and healthcare, limiting their mobility, and isolating Palestinians from each other. We can track the yellowwashing of Israel in the ways that the state of Israel and American Zionist lobbyists have produced and circulated a narrative of Israeli alliances with Asian Americans through the figure of U.S. Senator Daniel Inouye.
In this essay, I trace the circuits of yellowwashing narratives representing U.S. aid to Israel through the historical figure and substance of Inouye. Through a critical analysis of such yellowwashing, I argue that the work that many of us have done concerning the intersection of settler colonial studies and indigenous studies in Hawaiʻi is particularly useful in considering articulations of the US settler state with the Israeli settler state and the ways they are mutually constitutive. I also argue that this yellowwashing of Israel opens up another dimension to these color washings: as Israel circulated the figure of Inouye, the substance of Inouye’s actions accentuates the ways that US settler colonialism is constitutive of Inouye’s positionality as a Japanese American. I then foreground what has been erased in these displacements: Palestinian political agency under deadly Israeli assault. In contrast to the state-sponsored color washings of Israel, the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction (BDS) movement has enabled broader alliances in an international movement to end Israeli apartheid.
In this essay, I consider the naming of an Israeli missile facility after Hawai'i U.S. Senator Daniel Inouye, and I trace the circuits of yellowwashing narratives representing U.S. aid to Israel through the historical figure and substance of Inouye, Through a critical analysis of such yellowwashing, I consider the articulations of the US settler state with the Israeli settler state and the ways they are mutually constitutive. I also argue that this yellowwashing of Israel opens up another dimension to these color washings: as Israel circulated the figure of Inouye, the substance of Inouye’s actions make evident the ways that US settler colonialism is constitutive of Inouye’s positionality as a Japanese American. I then foreground what has been erased in these displacements: Palestinian political agency under deadly Israeli assault. In contrast to the state-sponsored color washings of Israel, the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction (BDS) movement has enabled broader alliances in an international movement to end Israeli apartheid.
In light of the United States' 2011 declaration of an economic and military policy refocus-ing on the Asia-Pacific region, Kuan-Hsing Chen's argument for Asia as method can be expanded in Asian American critique to consider Asia and the Pacific as method. A critical analysis of Asian American settler colonialism in Hawai‘l
and in the United States constitutes one such methodology that mobilizes a mode of self-reflexive inquiry in Asian American critique and conjoins it to a decolonizing and deimperializing movement in Asia and the Pacific, underscoring the need for Asian American settlers to challenge the US settler state and its assault on indigenous peoples and to enact a future beyond empires. On a global scale, US settler colonialism and its seizures of indigenous lands enable and are enabled by US imperialist practices in Asia and the Pacific. The Moana Nui 2011 conference in Honolulu countered the militarized capitalism of empires represented by APEC and the TPP, illustrating the ways that peoples of Asia and the Pacific can build on each other's struggles and enact economies that will sustain us beyond empires, economies premised not on the production of scarcity that drives capitalism but on the restoration of abundance.