T o control excessive utilization of medical care services by Medical Aid beneficiaries (MABs), t... more T o control excessive utilization of medical care services by Medical Aid beneficiaries (MABs), the Korean government has introduced the Designated Practice Scheme (DPS, July 2007). The purpose of this study was to assess the primary care quality of the DPS using the Korean Primary Care Assessment Tool (K-PCAT). Data were collected from the survey (2008-2009) of MABs who had to designate a community clinic as the first contact practice obligatorily in one district of Seoul. Among all eligible (n=164), we analyzed the data of 154 beneficiaries, excluding those who did not meet the K-PCAT criteria of a usual source of care. Primary care quality under the DPS was poor (58.1 points) on a 100-point scale, compared with those previously studied under the Korean health care system. More seriously it was very poor (48.9 points) in MABs without intention to continue participation in the DPS, who were 50% of all participants. Among 5 domains of the K-PCAT, comprehensiveness (44.7 points) and coordination (39.3 points) were lower in score than other domains, comparable to previous studies, representing the reality of primary care in South Korea. Primary care quality was better in MABs using primary care practices including general practice, family medicine, and internal medicine instead of other specialty practice groups (60.2 vs. 53.9 points, P=0.015), and in MABs with longer duration (≥3 vs. <3 years) since the first visit (59.7 vs. 51.9 points, P=0.010). These patterns were maintained after multivariate analysis, controlling for confounding variables. This research suggests that a complete overhaul of the scheme itself, such as the introduction of pay-for-performance method, etc., is necessary to improve primary care quality of the DPS.
Background: Disabled people are considered a vulnerable population in terms of health and social ... more Background: Disabled people are considered a vulnerable population in terms of health and social care. With the disability act having been enacted in 2015, the primary care physician system for disabled people was designed and implemented as a pilot project as of May 2018. This study was designed to assess the suitability and effectiveness of this pilot project. To this end, we conducted a survey of medical staff who participated in the pilot project, making use of questionnaires derived from preceding focused group interviews. Methods: We first conducted focused group interviews with experts who were actively engaged in the pilot project. Questionnaires were then prepared based on these focused group interviews, which were then administered electronically to 23 physicians who had provided medical services for disabled people throughout the pilot project. Results: In this study, physicians noted that all the services in the pilot program are useful for the healthcare of disabled people in the following order: comprehensive evaluation, education and counselling, coordination of care and medical referral, and comprehensive planning. The biggest problem identified was the complexity of the administrative procedure and the inadequacy of medical fees. The participants endorsed greater participation of secondary/tertiary hospitals, the establishment of links within the local community, and the strengthening of the role of public medical centers. Conclusion: All the services in the pilot program appear to be useful in the provision of healthcare of disabled people, and several measures are suggested for the improvement of the program prior to the actual implementation of the project.
Journal of agricultural medicine and community health, 2017
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the primary care quality of a public health center in a ... more Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the primary care quality of a public health center in a rural area using the Korean Primary Care Assessment Tool (KPCAT). It also examined some methodological issues in applying the KPCAT and interpreting its results. Methods: Seventy-nine patients who had visited their doctor more than four times responded to the KPCAT questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and a radar chart were used in analyzing data. Sign test was used to test the KPCAT score difference by don't know option scoring methods. Results: Median and interquartile range of the public health center's KPCAT scores were forty-five and sixteen points, respectively. Only the median of the first contact domain reached the expected value of seventyfive points. The proportions of those who scored under the expected value were under fifty percent in two of four comprehensiveness items, all of three coordinating function items, two of five personalized items and all of four family/community orientation items. There were some methodological issues including, how to score don't know option and make sure response scale consistency. Conclusions: There was much room to improve the primary care quality of the rural public health center. Especially, improvement is needed in the domain of coordinating function and family/community orientation. We also hope that methodological improvement of the KPCAT contributes to more valid and reliable primary care assessment.
This study aimed to describe the ecology of medical care in Korea. Using the yearly data of 2012 ... more This study aimed to describe the ecology of medical care in Korea. Using the yearly data of 2012 derived from the Korea Health Panel, we estimated the numbers of people per 1,000 residents aged 18 and over who had any health problem and/or any medical care at a variety of care settings, such as clinics, hospitals, and tertiary hospitals, in an average month. There was a total of 11,518 persons in the study population. While the number of those who had any health problem in an average month was estimated to be 939 per 1,000 persons, the estimated numbers of ambulatory care users were 333 at clinics, 101 at hospital outpatient departments, 35 at tertiary hospital outpatient departments, and 38 for Korean Oriental medical providers. The number of people who used emergency care at least once was 7 per 1,000 persons in an average month. The numbers of people hospitalized in clinics and hospitals were 3 and 8, respectively, while 3 persons were admitted to tertiary hospitals. There was a gap between the number of people experiencing any health problem and that of those having any medical care, and primary care comprised a large share of people's medical care experiences. It was noteworthy that more patients received ambulatory care at tertiary hospitals in Korea than in other countries. We hope that discussion about care delivery system reform and further studies will be encouraged.
T o control excessive utilization of medical care services by Medical Aid beneficiaries (MABs), t... more T o control excessive utilization of medical care services by Medical Aid beneficiaries (MABs), the Korean government has introduced the Designated Practice Scheme (DPS, July 2007). The purpose of this study was to assess the primary care quality of the DPS using the Korean Primary Care Assessment Tool (K-PCAT). Data were collected from the survey (2008-2009) of MABs who had to designate a community clinic as the first contact practice obligatorily in one district of Seoul. Among all eligible (n=164), we analyzed the data of 154 beneficiaries, excluding those who did not meet the K-PCAT criteria of a usual source of care. Primary care quality under the DPS was poor (58.1 points) on a 100-point scale, compared with those previously studied under the Korean health care system. More seriously it was very poor (48.9 points) in MABs without intention to continue participation in the DPS, who were 50% of all participants. Among 5 domains of the K-PCAT, comprehensiveness (44.7 points) and coordination (39.3 points) were lower in score than other domains, comparable to previous studies, representing the reality of primary care in South Korea. Primary care quality was better in MABs using primary care practices including general practice, family medicine, and internal medicine instead of other specialty practice groups (60.2 vs. 53.9 points, P=0.015), and in MABs with longer duration (≥3 vs. <3 years) since the first visit (59.7 vs. 51.9 points, P=0.010). These patterns were maintained after multivariate analysis, controlling for confounding variables. This research suggests that a complete overhaul of the scheme itself, such as the introduction of pay-for-performance method, etc., is necessary to improve primary care quality of the DPS.
Background: Disabled people are considered a vulnerable population in terms of health and social ... more Background: Disabled people are considered a vulnerable population in terms of health and social care. With the disability act having been enacted in 2015, the primary care physician system for disabled people was designed and implemented as a pilot project as of May 2018. This study was designed to assess the suitability and effectiveness of this pilot project. To this end, we conducted a survey of medical staff who participated in the pilot project, making use of questionnaires derived from preceding focused group interviews. Methods: We first conducted focused group interviews with experts who were actively engaged in the pilot project. Questionnaires were then prepared based on these focused group interviews, which were then administered electronically to 23 physicians who had provided medical services for disabled people throughout the pilot project. Results: In this study, physicians noted that all the services in the pilot program are useful for the healthcare of disabled people in the following order: comprehensive evaluation, education and counselling, coordination of care and medical referral, and comprehensive planning. The biggest problem identified was the complexity of the administrative procedure and the inadequacy of medical fees. The participants endorsed greater participation of secondary/tertiary hospitals, the establishment of links within the local community, and the strengthening of the role of public medical centers. Conclusion: All the services in the pilot program appear to be useful in the provision of healthcare of disabled people, and several measures are suggested for the improvement of the program prior to the actual implementation of the project.
Journal of agricultural medicine and community health, 2017
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the primary care quality of a public health center in a ... more Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the primary care quality of a public health center in a rural area using the Korean Primary Care Assessment Tool (KPCAT). It also examined some methodological issues in applying the KPCAT and interpreting its results. Methods: Seventy-nine patients who had visited their doctor more than four times responded to the KPCAT questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and a radar chart were used in analyzing data. Sign test was used to test the KPCAT score difference by don't know option scoring methods. Results: Median and interquartile range of the public health center's KPCAT scores were forty-five and sixteen points, respectively. Only the median of the first contact domain reached the expected value of seventyfive points. The proportions of those who scored under the expected value were under fifty percent in two of four comprehensiveness items, all of three coordinating function items, two of five personalized items and all of four family/community orientation items. There were some methodological issues including, how to score don't know option and make sure response scale consistency. Conclusions: There was much room to improve the primary care quality of the rural public health center. Especially, improvement is needed in the domain of coordinating function and family/community orientation. We also hope that methodological improvement of the KPCAT contributes to more valid and reliable primary care assessment.
This study aimed to describe the ecology of medical care in Korea. Using the yearly data of 2012 ... more This study aimed to describe the ecology of medical care in Korea. Using the yearly data of 2012 derived from the Korea Health Panel, we estimated the numbers of people per 1,000 residents aged 18 and over who had any health problem and/or any medical care at a variety of care settings, such as clinics, hospitals, and tertiary hospitals, in an average month. There was a total of 11,518 persons in the study population. While the number of those who had any health problem in an average month was estimated to be 939 per 1,000 persons, the estimated numbers of ambulatory care users were 333 at clinics, 101 at hospital outpatient departments, 35 at tertiary hospital outpatient departments, and 38 for Korean Oriental medical providers. The number of people who used emergency care at least once was 7 per 1,000 persons in an average month. The numbers of people hospitalized in clinics and hospitals were 3 and 8, respectively, while 3 persons were admitted to tertiary hospitals. There was a gap between the number of people experiencing any health problem and that of those having any medical care, and primary care comprised a large share of people's medical care experiences. It was noteworthy that more patients received ambulatory care at tertiary hospitals in Korea than in other countries. We hope that discussion about care delivery system reform and further studies will be encouraged.
Uploads
Papers by 용준 최