Yury Fedorov

Hi @jukomericki, sorry to hear that you had issues with k3s preset😿 Do you use MacOS on arm64 architecture? I think the issue might be caused by poor performance of...

Hi @jukomericki, Since you have amd64 macos, using rebuilt images won't help. Anyway, I tried building the images for arm64 architecture (I use it...) and it appears that k3s-in-docker doesn't...

Hi @mathnogueira and thank you for contribution, this looks great! I will properly review the change this weekend. So far I only noticed that the test you added is basically...

Hi @zdunecki and thanks for the ideas (and for using Gnomock 😻) Numbers 1 and 2 are great and fairly simple, I think these 2 features can be merged very...

Hi, @imsk17! Of course. Thank you! If you need any help getting started, I'm here to help.

@imsk17, that's fine! I think we should go for quick wins, and having a working preset that creates a dynamodb container, even without initial data, would be great. What do...

I think it would complicate the development too much for the value it provides. If you'd like to work on initial data setup in dynamodb, I'd recommend to work on...

@nawa, I think using the [official docker image](https://hub.docker.com/r/amazon/dynamodb-local) would be as close to the real thing as possible, probably closer than Localstack implementation. Another factor is the API. Take Localstack...

Thanks for suggesting, it sounds great! From what I see in your fork, there are only two differences from regular postgres: - image changed to `postgis/postgis` - there is a...

@dosco, since you have much more experience with it, could you help to define the scope of this task? You are already familiar with Gnomock, and it would be great...