Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A handful were deprecated and no longer active.
copyloopvarpoints out that you no longer have to alias a loop variable before capturing it in a closure. But it's not wrong to still do so and there are too many of them in this code base.intrangepoints out that these days you can dofor i := range 10. There are too many c-style loops to care to go through all of them. Besides, I don't quite like how it implicitly starts at0. I would have preferred something like the Rust syntaxfor i in 0..10.err113has an opinion on how to construct errors. Far too many of them to conform.Not that anyone is listening, or that this is particularly actionable, but I have not been impressed Go's linters. Perhaps I am simply spoiled by Rust's clippy. One of the best features is that can automatically apply the lint's suggestion (correctly! I have never seen in generate bunk code).