Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Antichess Variant #187

Closed
ALharchi opened this issue Nov 14, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Antichess Variant #187

ALharchi opened this issue Nov 14, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@ALharchi
Copy link

Hello,
Would it be possible to add support to Antichess Variant? See here: https://lichess.org/variant/antichess

It might be complicated, but maybe a start would be just disabling all checks for a valid move/position? What would be your suggestion for that?

Thanks in advance.

@yo35
Copy link
Owner

yo35 commented Nov 16, 2020

Hi,
It should be feasible (obviously the antichess is not the most complicated variant to implement). Still, I have to figure out how to switch properly from one variant to another in the code, without duplicating to many things. I'll look at that.

@ALharchi
Copy link
Author

Any chance this will see the light soon? Thanks :)

@yo35
Copy link
Owner

yo35 commented May 22, 2021

Not at the top priority currently...

@yo35
Copy link
Owner

yo35 commented Jul 25, 2021

This is available in RPB Chessboard version 6.2.0 (just released).

Currently, the antichess games must contain the PGN header [Variant "Antichess"] so that they can be recognized as such. This corresponds to the Lichess convention, but my guess is that PGN files generated by other websites may follow a different convention (e.g. [Variant "Giveaway"], [Variant "Suicidechess"] or whatever...). If this is the case, and if you encounter some problem with these kind of headers, please let me know.

@yo35 yo35 closed this as completed Jul 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants