Skip to content

docs: v0.20.0 #2161

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
JuArce merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2025
Merged

docs: v0.20.0 #2161

JuArce merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2025

Conversation

@JuArce
Copy link
Collaborator

@JuArce JuArce commented Oct 23, 2025

docs: v0.20.0

Description

This PR updates the docs to v0.20.0

Type of change

  • Documentation

Checklist

  • “Hotfix” to testnet, everything else to staging
  • Linked to Github Issue
  • This change depends on code or research by an external entity
    • Acknowledgements were updated to give credit
  • Unit tests added
  • This change requires new documentation.
    • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • This change is an Optimization
    • Benchmarks added/run
  • Has a known issue
  • If your PR changes the Operator compatibility (Ex: Upgrade prover versions)
    • This PR adds compatibility for operator for both versions and do not change crates/docs/examples
    • This PR updates batcher and docs/examples to the newer version. This requires the operator are already updated to be compatible

@JuArce JuArce self-assigned this Oct 23, 2025
@JuArce JuArce added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 23, 2025
Merged via the queue into staging with commit 895cd41 Oct 23, 2025
3 checks passed
@JuArce JuArce deleted the 2160-docs-v0200 branch October 23, 2025 15:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@MarcosNicolau MarcosNicolau MarcosNicolau approved these changes

@maximopalopoli maximopalopoli maximopalopoli approved these changes

Assignees

@JuArce JuArce

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@JuArce @MarcosNicolau @maximopalopoli