Description

Trying to be a designer goes wrong. This undoes the artistic touch I wanted to give in the aggregated proofs table.

Now it is more simple:

Type of change

• New feature
• Bug fix
• Optimization
• Refactor

Checklist

• “Hotfix” to testnet, everything else to staging
• Linked to Github Issue
• This change depends on code or research by an external entity
  • Acknowledgements were updated to give credit
• Unit tests added
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.
• This change is an Optimization
  • Benchmarks added/run
• Has a known issue
  • Link to the open issue addressing it
• If your PR changes the Operator compatibility (Ex: Upgrade prover versions)
  • This PR adds compatibility for operator for both versions and do not change batcher/docs/examples
  • This PR updates batcher and docs/examples to the newer version. This requires the operator are already updated to be compatible