Skip to content

docs: update to v0.15.0 #1820

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
MauroToscano merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2025
Merged

docs: update to v0.15.0 #1820

MauroToscano merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2025

Conversation

@JuArce
Copy link
Collaborator

@JuArce JuArce commented Mar 20, 2025 •
edited
Loading

update to v0.15.0

Description

Update to v0.15.0

closes #1817

Checklist

  • “Hotfix” to testnet, everything else to staging
  • Linked to Github Issue
  • This change depends on code or research by an external entity
    • Acknowledgements were updated to give credit
  • Unit tests added
  • This change requires new documentation.
    • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • This change is an Optimization
    • Benchmarks added/run
  • Has a known issue
  • If your PR changes the Operator compatibility (Ex: Upgrade prover versions)
    • This PR adds compatibility for operator for both versions and do not change batcher/docs/examples
    • This PR updates batcher and docs/examples to the newer version. This requires the operator are already updated to be compatible

@JuArce JuArce self-assigned this Mar 20, 2025
@MauroToscano MauroToscano added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 21, 2025
Merged via the queue into staging with commit c237af4 Mar 21, 2025
3 checks passed
@MauroToscano MauroToscano deleted the 1817-docs-update-to-v0150 branch March 21, 2025 20:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@MauroToscano MauroToscano MauroToscano approved these changes

Assignees

@JuArce JuArce

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@JuArce @MauroToscano