Skip to content

[WIP] Airspec launcher#685

Closed
xerial wants to merge 3 commits intowvlet:masterfrom
xerial:airspec-launcher
Closed

[WIP] Airspec launcher#685
xerial wants to merge 3 commits intowvlet:masterfrom
xerial:airspec-launcher

Conversation

@xerial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@xerial xerial commented Sep 9, 2019

Create a standalone launcher for AirSpec

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Sep 9, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #685 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 66.66%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #685      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.24%   83.24%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         230      231       +1     
  Lines        8754     8753       -1     
  Branches      636      646      +10     
==========================================
- Hits         7287     7286       -1     
  Misses       1467     1467
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
airspec/src/main/scala/wvlet/airspec/AirSpec.scala 93.33% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
.../main/scala/wvlet/airspec/runner/AirSpecTask.scala 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
...scala/wvlet/airspec/runner/AirSpecTaskRunner.scala 85.45% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
airspec/src/main/scala/wvlet/airspec/package.scala 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
...ain/scala/wvlet/airspec/runner/AirSpecLogger.scala 73.33% <ø> (+1.45%) ⬆️
...pec/src/main/scala/wvlet/airspec/AirSpecMain.scala 0% <0%> (ø)
.../scala/wvlet/airspec/runner/AirSpecRunnerSbt.scala 62.5% <100%> (ø)
...rspec/src/main/scala/wvlet/airspec/Framework.scala 80% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9434e6b...c666f34. Read the comment docs.

@xerial xerial mentioned this pull request Sep 9, 2019
14 tasks
@xerial xerial mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2019
76 tasks
@xerial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

xerial commented Jan 2, 2020

We need to redo this work as we added new test syntax #876

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant