Skip to content

fix: use Int32Array for signed VLQ delta accumulation in readMappings#206

Merged
alexander-akait merged 1 commit intomainfrom
claude/review-pr-192-KIf9l
Apr 22, 2026
Merged

fix: use Int32Array for signed VLQ delta accumulation in readMappings#206
alexander-akait merged 1 commit intomainfrom
claude/review-pr-192-KIf9l

Conversation

@alexander-akait
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

VLQ deltas are signed, so a sequence whose cumulative value goes
negative (e.g. malformed mappings) would wrap to a large unsigned
integer when stored in a Uint32Array. Switch the accumulator to
Int32Array so negative cumulative values round-trip correctly to
the onMapping callback. Also fix an "orignalColumn" typo in the
adjacent comment, and add a regression test.

VLQ deltas are signed, so a sequence whose cumulative value goes
negative (e.g. malformed mappings) would wrap to a large unsigned
integer when stored in a Uint32Array. Switch the accumulator to
Int32Array so negative cumulative values round-trip correctly to
the onMapping callback. Also fix an "orignalColumn" typo in the
adjacent comment, and add a regression test.
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA Not Signed

@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: fec6611

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
webpack-sources Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.79%. Comparing base (58420d1) to head (fec6611).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #206      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.87%   97.79%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          25       25              
  Lines        1884     1908      +24     
  Branches      594      600       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         1844     1866      +22     
- Misses         38       40       +2     
  Partials        2        2              
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 97.79% <100.00%> (-0.08%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 31.93%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 159 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
prefix-source: getPrefix() 120.1 µs 176.3 µs -31.85%
prefix-source: original() 120.5 µs 177.1 µs -31.93%

Comparing claude/review-pr-192-KIf9l (fec6611) with main (9788e55)

Open in CodSpeed

@alexander-akait alexander-akait merged commit adf17ec into main Apr 22, 2026
20 of 31 checks passed
@alexander-akait alexander-akait deleted the claude/review-pr-192-KIf9l branch April 22, 2026 16:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants