docs(contributing): alternative way to test#1506
Conversation
ematipico
requested review from
alexander-akait and
michael-ciniawsky
as code owners
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| `<ID>` is the ID of the pull request. | ||
| OR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we add docs for npm/yarn link usage here instead? You can keep "webpack-dev-server": "file:../path/to/local/webapck-dev-server/fork" if you like, but please incoporate it into the first example as an alternative value
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I could update the it with link but I'd prefer to do it with another PR, if it's ok
michael-ciniawsky
changed the title
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1506 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 87.62% 87.62%
=======================================
Files 9 9
Lines 590 590
Branches 176 176
=======================================
Hits 517 517
Misses 61 61
Partials 12 12Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
PR updated! |
|
/cc @ematipico friendly ping, sorry for delay, can you rebase? |
5 participants
For Bugs and Features; did you add new tests?
N/A
Motivation / Use-Case
Propose a different way to test the local fork without the need to push to github. I use this way then I want to install deps that live in my local machine
Breaking Changes
N/A
Additional Info