Skip to content

feat: mark several options as experimental in WebpackOptions#20769

Closed
bjohansebas wants to merge 2 commits intowebpack:mainfrom
bjohansebas:experimental-flag
Closed

feat: mark several options as experimental in WebpackOptions#20769
bjohansebas wants to merge 2 commits intowebpack:mainfrom
bjohansebas:experimental-flag

Conversation

@bjohansebas
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bjohansebas bjohansebas commented Apr 3, 2026

Summary
webpack/tooling#35

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Did you add tests for your changes?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

If relevant, what needs to be documented once your changes are merged or what have you already documented?

Use of AI

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 3, 2026 00:48
@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot Bot commented Apr 3, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: ca16c1d

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.42%. Comparing base (61fbd29) to head (ca16c1d).
⚠️ Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

❌ Your changes status has failed because you have indirect coverage changes. Learn more about Unexpected Coverage Changes and reasons for indirect coverage changes.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #20769      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.42%   91.42%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         559      559              
  Lines       55103    55103              
  Branches    14529    14529              
==========================================
- Hits        50380    50377       -3     
- Misses       4723     4726       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 90.41% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
test262 41.97% <ø> (ø)
unit 36.21% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 25.5%

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 141 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Memory benchmark "cache-filesystem", scenario '{"name":"mode-development-rebuild","mode":"development","watch":true}' 765.1 KB 1,027 KB -25.5%
Memory benchmark "asset-modules-source", scenario '{"name":"mode-development","mode":"development"}' 920.7 KB 505.8 KB +82.02%
Memory benchmark "react", scenario '{"name":"mode-development-rebuild","mode":"development","watch":true}' 865.3 KB 649.7 KB +33.18%

Comparing bjohansebas:experimental-flag (ca16c1d) with main (61fbd29)

Open in CodSpeed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant