Skip to content

Comments

Editorial: Don't reference IDL boolean for values in tensors#735

Merged
fdwr merged 1 commit intowebmachinelearning:mainfrom
inexorabletash:no-idl-bool
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

Editorial: Don't reference IDL boolean for values in tensors#735
fdwr merged 1 commit intowebmachinelearning:mainfrom
inexorabletash:no-idl-bool

Conversation

@inexorabletash
Copy link
Contributor

@inexorabletash inexorabletash commented Jul 22, 2024

The spec should only reference IDL types in prose when dealing with binding, e.g. in unions, and maybe internal slots. When discussing values in tensors, just be explicit and don't try to link to a definition that doesn't really apply.


Preview | Diff

The spec should only reference IDL types in prose when dealing with
binding, e.g. in unions, and maybe internal slots. When discussing
values in tensors, just be explicit and don't try to link to a
definition that doesn't really apply.
@inexorabletash
Copy link
Contributor Author

Another simple one - @fdwr can you review/merge?

Copy link
Collaborator

@fdwr fdwr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@fdwr
Copy link
Collaborator

fdwr commented Jul 23, 2024

@huningxin - this one is simple enough that I'll just merge it now. Please comment afterward if anything was dubious.

@fdwr fdwr merged commit 4b90605 into webmachinelearning:main Jul 23, 2024
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2024
SHA: 4b90605
Reason: push, by fdwr

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@huningxin huningxin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants