-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 181
Conflict of Interest in Council composition #749
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
AB DecisionClosing this issue was done with an explicit AB decisionClosing this issue was done with an explicit AB decisionClosed: AcceptedThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestionThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestionFO/CouncilIssues related to the W3C Council and Formal Objection HandlingIssues related to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
Milestone
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
AB DecisionClosing this issue was done with an explicit AB decisionClosing this issue was done with an explicit AB decisionClosed: AcceptedThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestionThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestionFO/CouncilIssues related to the W3C Council and Formal Objection HandlingIssues related to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
The optics on this aren't very good; a body that makes a decision that's being appealed should not have oversight of the appeal.
The straightforward thing to do is to use an alternative process for appeals of TAG or AB decisions -- probably have the AB as the appeal body for the TAG, and the Board as the appeal body for the AB.