Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rephasing and removing the normative effect of proposal PR #1543 #1573

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 23, 2023

Conversation

riccardoAlbertoni
Copy link
Contributor

The PR tries to mediate between the proposal made in PR #1543 and the worries about impacting the normative part by providing two datatypes.

@pchampin, @dr-shorthair: Could this represent a viable compromise? Please refine it if needed.

Copy link
Contributor

@dr-shorthair dr-shorthair left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Modest proposal is fine for me

Copy link
Contributor

@pchampin pchampin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the delay. I'm ok with not changing the schema. I made a suggestion to slightly improve the text, but I can live with the original text as well.

Co-authored-by: Pierre-Antoine Champin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants