Many thanks for preparing this, @andrea-perego .
I think you have captured the discussion we had well, and you also provided a good overview of alternatives.
I have just added a couple of things. Please see my suggestions above.

After we have solved my revisions, I think we will be ready to change the pull's status, making it ready for other editors' review.

BTW, this pull relates with #89 #1238 #91 #92

Many thanks for preparing this, @andrea-perego .
I think you have captured the discussion we had well, and you also provided a good overview of alternatives.
I have just added a couple of things. Please see my suggestions above.

Thanks, @riccardoAlbertoni . Just accepted your changes.

@riccardoAlbertoni , I tried to add the issue summary section and issue #1258 . The issue box seems to show up correctly:

https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-versioning/dcat/#issue-container-number-1258

However, the issue summary section seems to have some rendering issues. You can see it right before the introduction:

https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-versioning/dcat/#introduction

This may be a bug in the new ReSpec library. I'll raise an issue in the ReSpec repo.

Added links to relevant issues (as decided during the DCAT subgroup call).

Please have a check. Then, I think we can mark this PR as ready for review.

@andrea-perego: I've checked this, and I think we can have this PR as ready for review. Many thanks.

@andrea-perego: I've checked this, and I think we can have this PR as ready for review. Many thanks.

Thanks, @riccardoAlbertoni .

Just for our records, the issue I reported in #1257 (comment) has been fixed - see https://github.com/w3c/respec/pull/3152