It would be great if such across-the-board alignment could be implemented! I guess this is possible since you are the author Makx?

I would certainly want to try to do that, but depends on whether I'll have time to do it. Anyway, I'll put it on my to-do list, but would want to wait until we have a stable version of DCAT, at least after the next Public Working Draft.

I think we need to raise this issue in one of the plenary calls, as (as you say, @makxdekkers ) the revision of ADMS was not explicitly included in the DXWG charter.

In #53 I propose to 'promote' adms:Identifier class to DCAT
I think this would also resolve #68

THere may be other ideas from ADMS that could be added to DCAT instead.
Otherwise, revision of ADMS is for another time and another working group.

@dr-shorthair I agree with @andrea-perego that we need to raise this in a plenary call. ADMS is very closely linked to DCAT so it makes sense to keep them aligned.

@makxdekkers , would you like to revive this issue? Or should we close it?

Noting no objections, I'm closing this issue.