Skip to content

chore[tool]: widen version bounds for packaging#4590

Merged
charles-cooper merged 2 commits intovyperlang:masterfrom
charles-cooper:chore/ci/bump-packaging
Apr 23, 2025
Merged

chore[tool]: widen version bounds for packaging#4590
charles-cooper merged 2 commits intovyperlang:masterfrom
charles-cooper:chore/ci/bump-packaging

Conversation

@charles-cooper
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@charles-cooper charles-cooper commented Apr 22, 2025

What I did

How I did it

How to verify it

Commit message

`poetry` depends on a higher version of `packaging`. relax the version
bounds

remove upper bound since packaging uses calendar versioning

Description for the changelog

Cute Animal Picture

Put a link to a cute animal picture inside the parenthesis-->

poetry depends on a higher version of `packaging`. relax the version
bounds
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.70%. Comparing base (e4e9d7c) to head (2ece368).
Report is 75 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4590      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.68%   92.70%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         123      123              
  Lines       17575    17571       -4     
  Branches     2988     2988              
==========================================
+ Hits        16289    16290       +1     
+ Misses        888      883       -5     
  Partials      398      398              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@lemenkov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Since it's has a calendar versioning would it be bettter just to remove the upper limit for packaging entirely? See vyperlang/vvm#40

@charles-cooper
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Since it's has a calendar versioning would it be bettter just to remove the upper limit for packaging entirely? See vyperlang/vvm#40

ok, good point

packaging uses calendar versioning
@charles-cooper
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

2ece368

@charles-cooper charles-cooper marked this pull request as ready for review April 22, 2025 14:16
@charles-cooper charles-cooper enabled auto-merge (squash) April 23, 2025 10:16
@charles-cooper charles-cooper merged commit b396d12 into vyperlang:master Apr 23, 2025
163 checks passed
@charles-cooper charles-cooper deleted the chore/ci/bump-packaging branch April 24, 2025 08:35
lemenkov added a commit to lemenkov/py-solc-x that referenced this pull request May 8, 2025
Packaging uses calendar versioning so there is no need to limit the
upper version.

See also issues vyperlang/vvm#39, vyperlang/vyper#4590.

Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov <[email protected]>
lemenkov added a commit to lemenkov/py-solc-x that referenced this pull request May 8, 2025
Packaging uses calendar versioning so there is no need to limit the
upper version.

See also issues vyperlang/vvm#39, vyperlang/vyper#4590.

Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov <[email protected]>
binary-opsl added a commit to binary-opsl/py-solc-x that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2025
Packaging uses calendar versioning so there is no need to limit the
upper version.

See also issues vyperlang/vvm#39, vyperlang/vyper#4590.

Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov <[email protected]>
node-seeker574 added a commit to node-seeker574/py-solc-x that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2025
Packaging uses calendar versioning so there is no need to limit the
upper version.

See also issues vyperlang/vvm#39, vyperlang/vyper#4590.

Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants