Add podGroup completed phase #2667
Conversation
volcano-sh-bot
added
the
size/L
waiterQ
force-pushed
the
add-pg-completed
branch
2 times, most recently
from
9d31199 to
3a6c9e4
Compare
Signed-off-by: Gaizhi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: shaoqiu <[email protected]>
waiterQ
force-pushed
the
add-pg-completed
branch
from
3a6c9e4 to
cf17b60
Compare
| pg.queue.Add(req) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (pg *pgcontroller) addReplicaSet(obj interface{}) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@waiterQ As far as I know, when replicaset was created, it would always be 0 replica. And after creating, the replicaset would scale up to defined replica numbers. So why deleting podgroup on both addReplicaSet and updateReplicaSet, but not only updateReplicaSet?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, you're right. In normal process with one version, volcano just need updateReplicaSet, and if consider the situation upgrade from a version to another, there isn't addReplicaSet help to cleanup stock podgroups in cluster. addReplicaSet is work with already-exist podgroups, addReplicaSet work with upcoming podgroups.
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if *rs.Spec.Replicas == 0 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is a probability that there will be two replicasets with none zero replicas when doing roll upgrade which means two pg exists, does this matter?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is about deployment's rollingUpdate strategy, in pod rolling creating, its definitely 2 kind pods exists. I think it's normal, not a problem.
|
Please add the test results on the PR, thanks. |
ok, done. |
| @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ | |||
| /* | |||
| Copyright 2021 The Volcano Authors. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the Copyright is not correct.
| Expect(len(pgs.Items)).To(Equal(1), "only one podGroup should be exists") | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| It("k8s Job", func() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please use a formal and complete description for func
| fmt.Sprintf("expectPod %d, q1ScheduledPod %d, q2ScheduledPod %d", expectPod, q1ScheduledPod, q2ScheduledPod)) | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| It("changeable Deployment's PodGroup", func() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please give a formal and complete description for func
| @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ | |||
| /* | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it is a util package, why name the file name as deployment.go
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: william-wang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
volcano-sh-bot
added
the
approved
| if int32(allocated) >= jobInfo.PodGroup.Spec.MinMember { | ||
| status.Phase = scheduling.PodGroupRunning | ||
| // If all allocated tasks is succeeded, it's completed | ||
| if len(jobInfo.TaskStatusIndex[api.Succeeded]) == allocated { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
for batchv1 native job, if using .spec.completions and .spec.parallelism in job, for case, successed 10, in the same time, the queue is full, other 10 pod will pending, len(jobInfo.TaskStatusIndex[api.Succeeded]) == allocated will be true, job not finished but pg status is completed, would it happen?
6 participants
Modification Motivation
Volcano can schedule normal pods, but it shows up podGroup inqueue problem at some conditions. scheduling k8s-job,
podGroup is still at running phase when pod went to completed phase; changing deployment's requeuest will cause old podGroup in phase Inqueue.
So I pick and fix #2589 (Feature/add replicaset gc pg), and add phase Completed for normal pod podGroup to enhances podGroup.
Test Result
when deployment roll-updating, there're two podgroups exists.
when deployment roll-update is over, one podgroup left.
when k8s job is completed
podgroup is completed
ci e2e result
