Always run on 1 core CPU only

No matter how many cores I choose, it always runs on only one core.
It reflects on the Task Manager as well as the "current rate" metrics as well.

I guess that we need to use Process to achieve it?
from multiprocessing import cpu_count, Process

Reference: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22700164/python-running-multiple-processes-simultaneously

Would you please let me know your cpu's specifications?

This is interesting as i am running all 24 cores and getting 16,000 - 18,000 k/s on the BTC Puzzle

CPU used:

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 4.20 GHz

Should i be getting more than that?

EDIT: I just tried by selecting 1 core and getting solid 14,000 k/s but only 2,000 more if i use 24 cores which doesnt seem right.

I guess it's because of using threads instead of processes. Processes don't share memory, that's why I used threads.
I have to revise this part of the program.

Mine is i7-9750h. But I guess you know how to fix it already.

Yes, I think so.
Will be fixed soon✅

@vlnahp

Yes, I think so. Will be fixed soon✅

Hey @vlnahp i had a random questio of the backing of this bug report here.
Is there the possibility of the speed increasing from 15,000 k/s or is his based on specs of the machine used?
I know you mentioned threads are used at the moment but once fixed, will it be faster?

Yes it's possible. But I need some time to do some research about threading and GIL lock.

Should I try to fix this if you are busy now?

Should I try to fix this if you are busy now?

Yes I'm busy. I believe it is not possible to keep the speed() function and use multiple threads. But you can give it a try!

Okay, let me give it a try first

Taking advantage of the GPUs it will be even faster

Okay, let me give it a try first

Hello 👋 how did you go with this after giving it a try? Keen to know if you found a way or possibility. Thank you.

Hello folks! Anyone found anything with balance?

Hello folks! Anyone found anything with balance?

Hey PopeDollar I have been using the offline brute and targeting one BTC address for about 2 months straight now via a laptop & no such luck yet.

I do believe some here have found gold 👍👍

It's all luck at the end of the day as chances are slim to none.

Hello folks! Anyone found anything with balance?

Finding a key is like finding a grain of sand in the whole universe. You could search for millions of years without even scratching the surface ;)
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/w0bv37/how_secure_are_seed_phrases/

It's all luck at the end of the day as chances are slim to none.
No, chances are so small you can consider them "none".

@vlnahp

Hi @vlnahp

I hope all is well with your studies.
I just wanted to check in and see if yourself or anyone has found a resolution to the outstanding bug here?

I can appreciate how busy you are of course!

Lu5Goon

@vlnahp

Hi @vlnahp

I hope all is well with your studies. I just wanted to check in and see if yourself or anyone has found a resolution to the outstanding bug here?

I can appreciate how busy you are of course!

Lu5Goon

Hello!
Unfortunately no success yet. It's going to take time.

No matter how many cores I choose, it always runs on only one core. It reflects on the Task Manager as well as the "current rate" metrics as well.

I guess that we need to use Process to achieve it? from multiprocessing import cpu_count, Process

Reference: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22700164/python-running-multiple-processes-simultaneously

I made a mini version to try out tasks instead of a pool:
https://github.com/telejoshi/brutithreads

You can try this one and tell if it works.

Hi All,

Been a while! Just wanted to check and see if this bug has been fixed or looked into?

👍👍

I will try to do this on the weekend or next week.

Try to solve "Always run on 1 core CPU only " vlnahp#39

Hey folks, I made this PR to solve this issue. I hope that I can have more time to do more but that's all

#64

Hello folks! Anyone found anything with balance?

Never....Even if you use fastecdsa and secp256k1 as ice at best it can handle 3MK/s. Which takes about a couple of billion years to find something. Even using Pollard's kangaroo algorithm *(~200 Petakeys/s per thread) takes you a few hundred years if you don't know the public key and the range the key is in. But don't worry, we like to play like children.

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

Always run on 1 core CPU only #39

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Always run on 1 core CPU only #39

Description

Activity

vlnahp commented on Apr 26, 2022

0x18d3774 commented on Apr 26, 2022

vlnahp commented on Apr 26, 2022

minhhieugma commented on Apr 26, 2022

vlnahp commented on Apr 26, 2022

0x18d3774 commented on May 12, 2022

vlnahp commented on May 14, 2022

minhhieugma commented on May 19, 2022

vlnahp commented on May 20, 2022

minhhieugma commented on May 21, 2022

Rosario144 commented on Jun 30, 2022

0x18d3774 commented on Jun 30, 2022

PopeDollar commented on Jul 25, 2022

0x18d3774 commented on Jul 27, 2022

telejoshi commented on Jul 28, 2022

0x18d3774 commented on Aug 25, 2022

vlnahp commented on Aug 25, 2022

telejoshi commented on Aug 25, 2022

0x18d3774 commented on Apr 16, 2023

minhhieugma commented on Apr 20, 2023

minhhieugma commented on Apr 22, 2023

mikorist commented on Jul 26, 2023

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions