Skip to content

Conversation

@pano9000
Copy link
Contributor

Hello,

I've tried to a short message into the pull-request template encouraging contributors to also provide a credible reference for the structure of the data that they are trying to validate.

Discussion about this was started in #2110

I am open to suggestions on the exact phrasing though!

closes #2110

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (54f4140) compared to base (6dba289).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #2161   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          105       105           
  Lines         2334      2334           
  Branches       586       586           
=========================================
  Hits          2334      2334           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Member

@WikiRik WikiRik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Phrasing is fine with me, thanks for the PR!

@profnandaa profnandaa merged commit 43803c0 into validatorjs:master Feb 8, 2023
@pano9000 pano9000 deleted the chore_pullrequest-template_#2110_v2 branch August 25, 2024 10:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make it mandatory to also provide references when creating new validators?

3 participants