README: Add more emphasis on security and longevity#3727
README: Add more emphasis on security and longevity#3727pquentin merged 4 commits intourllib3:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Let me know if this is desirable, I can add a changelog entry if we want. :) |
| Meet our alumni of lead maintainers since 2008: | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Isn't this list of all maintainers, not only lead ones?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To me, "alumni" are past maintainers, but some of us are still active in that list!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@pquentin What's better phrasing? "Meet our maintainers since 2008"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Updated, lmk what you think. :)
|
I reworked the README a bit more, taking more of the phrasing we started using in the docs landing page ("Much of the Python ecosystem already uses urllib3 and you should too"), and I merged the intro example into the Documentation section now called "Getting Started" which I think is fairly idiomatic these days for READMEs. Again, feel free to push back on any of these changes but please take another look. |
8c564a9 to
0e4142d
Compare
Added a point about security to the features and another note about our maintainers. I want to highlight that urllib3 prioritizes security/safety/longevity in ways that most other projects don't, not sure this is sufficient but perhaps a good starting point.
Taking some of the phrasing from the docs landing page
0e4142d to
2567fcd
Compare
Added a point about security to the features and another note about our maintainers.
I want to highlight that urllib3 prioritizes security/safety/longevity in ways that most other projects don't, not sure this is sufficient but perhaps a good starting point.
I don't feel very strongly about this change, feel free to close for now and stew on it for later iterations. Just wanted to get something pushed from our discussion.