Skip to content

Studio: fill the Hebrew and Swedish strings that left the strict i18n check red on main - #12881

Merged
danielhanchen merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/i18n-he-sv-parity
Oct 6, 2026
Merged

danielhanchen merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/i18n-he-sv-parity

Conversation

@danielhanchen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

npm run i18n:check:strict (the "Frontend build + bundle sanity" job in studio-frontend-ci.yml) has been failing on main since 6df2e23, so every PR that runs the frontend job goes red on it (#12875, #12876, #12878, #12879 today).

Cause

Two merges raced the Hebrew and Swedish catalogs:

The product was wrong here, not the check: Hebrew and Swedish users saw English for the decision model wizard, validation and progress strings.

Fix

  • he.ts: the 17 missing keys (decision API model labels and ready state, wizard checkpoint label and tooltip, the two decision validation messages, the three Decision API progress strings, the library "Made with" filter and the audio row).
  • sv.ts: the same 17, plus the six new sandbox keys, and the three removed ones deleted. The two short level labels are brought in line with the reworded English as well.

Placeholders match en for every new string ({model}, {columns}, {name}).

Verification

  • npm run i18n:check:strict: exit 1 on main, exit 0 on this branch (all 13 overlays pass).
  • npm run typecheck passes.
  • tests/lazy-locale-loading.test.ts, tests/sandbox-level.test.ts: 43 passed.

@danielhanchen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-06T18:26:30.323897Z b55e81c Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep it up!

Reviewed commit: b55e81cb42

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant