Conversation
This is a ZWJ sequence (adult, handshake, adult) Source: https://www.unicode.org/Public/emoji/12.0/emoji-zwj-sequences.txt
|
I feel like we need a more intelligent way to deal with gender and skin color in emojis. It would be a gargantuan task to do manually. |
|
For sure, but I came across these while implementing #51 and fixing them like this should be fine for now. |
|
Or, well, the bunny fix helps with an issue I came across. The other one is just nice to have anyway and serves as a specific patch since the handholding emoji are quite special in being explicitly gendered whereas most others are now gender-neutral by default. As an aside, I also noticed how the variants for |
knuesel
left a comment
knuesel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks like a strict improvement. If we later do something smarter for gendered emojis in a breaking way, that would also break the existing dancing.women.bunnny anyway...
4 participants
People with Bunny ears
These have been changed to be gender-neutral (in Unicode 9.0, according to this).
I also added the gender-specific ZWJ sequences while I was at it, since multi-character symbols are now possible.
Source: https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr51/#multiperson_gender
People holding hands
This is a ZWJ sequence, unlike the other three legacy variants.
I feel like this one only makes sense to also have, now that we can.
Not sure if we should actually merge this before typst#6489, but it's probably fine since I'm pretty sure that that will land before the next release.