-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
test: redo cockroachdb to service-container GHA and update its version to latest (24) #11190
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
9a8e78e
d36acde
3c3c8f2
7ea031b
6f7513d
5e4cc03
a59681a
36858ef
1e2d415
7ee4905
d0a7d08
4493267
7718e73
2e0f676
a5951da
29c303b
bdd36c3
c5ef5db
1f3737d
c649300
8d81914
a2619de
b36fbd3
54452a7
20eb464
38b96ca
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -975,7 +975,10 @@ describe("query builder > locking", () => { | |
| .createQueryBuilder(Post, "post") | ||
| .leftJoin("post.author", "user") | ||
| .setLock("pessimistic_write") | ||
| .getOne(), | ||
| .getOne() | ||
| .should.be.rejectedWith( | ||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This seems to be breaking the transaction and making Because Chai does not forward the error, We should probably make that function fail.
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yepp, it's the same thing in the privious test ;) There's this comment: |
||
| "FOR UPDATE cannot be applied to the nullable side of an outer join", | ||
| ), | ||
| ]) | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.