Skip to content

fix: benchmarking config template#1001

Merged
josecelano merged 1 commit intotorrust:developfrom
josecelano:fix-benchmarking-config
Aug 8, 2024
Merged

fix: benchmarking config template#1001
josecelano merged 1 commit intotorrust:developfrom
josecelano:fix-benchmarking-config

Conversation

@josecelano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fix benchmarking config template:

  • Missing [core.tracker_policy] section. The configuration was changed.
  • Missing database config. Needed when the default DB folder does not exist. With this config, a storage folder is not needed. We are not using DB, which requires DB for benchmarking.

- Missing [core.tracker_policy] section. Configuration was changed.
- Missing database config. Needed when the default DB folder does not
  exist. With this config storage folder is not needed. WE are not using
DB which required DB for benchmarking.
@josecelano josecelano added this to the v3.0.0 milestone Aug 8, 2024
@josecelano josecelano self-assigned this Aug 8, 2024
@josecelano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

ACK e563bfb

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Aug 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.10%. Comparing base (7ac1556) to head (e563bfb).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1001   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    77.10%   77.10%           
========================================
  Files          185      185           
  Lines        10063    10063           
========================================
  Hits          7759     7759           
  Misses        2304     2304           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@josecelano josecelano merged commit bd5f4e8 into torrust:develop Aug 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant