Sync multiple TQ types at once#7258
Merged
ShahabT merged 3 commits intoversioning-3.1-mergefrom Feb 6, 2025
Merged
Conversation
carlydf
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2025
Contributor
carlydf
left a comment
carlydf
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
approved with one comment
Co-authored-by: Carly de Frondeville <[email protected]>
carlydf
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2025
…b/sync-tq-types # Conflicts: # tests/versioning_3_test.go
ShahabT
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
## What changed? <!-- Describe what has changed in this PR --> Syncing TQ User Data for all types of a single TQ name at once to reduce the SetCurrent and SetRamping latency and flakiness of tests. ## Why? <!-- Tell your future self why have you made these changes --> ## How did you test it? <!-- How have you verified this change? Tested locally? Added a unit test? Checked in staging env? --> ## Potential risks <!-- Assuming the worst case, what can be broken when deploying this change to production? --> ## Documentation <!-- Have you made sure this change doesn't falsify anything currently stated in `docs/`? If significant new behavior is added, have you described that in `docs/`? --> ## Is hotfix candidate? <!-- Is this PR a hotfix candidate or does it require a notification to be sent to the broader community? (Yes/No) --> --------- Co-authored-by: Carly de Frondeville <[email protected]>
ShahabT
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
## What changed? <!-- Describe what has changed in this PR --> Syncing TQ User Data for all types of a single TQ name at once to reduce the SetCurrent and SetRamping latency and flakiness of tests. ## Why? <!-- Tell your future self why have you made these changes --> ## How did you test it? <!-- How have you verified this change? Tested locally? Added a unit test? Checked in staging env? --> ## Potential risks <!-- Assuming the worst case, what can be broken when deploying this change to production? --> ## Documentation <!-- Have you made sure this change doesn't falsify anything currently stated in `docs/`? If significant new behavior is added, have you described that in `docs/`? --> ## Is hotfix candidate? <!-- Is this PR a hotfix candidate or does it require a notification to be sent to the broader community? (Yes/No) --> --------- Co-authored-by: Carly de Frondeville <[email protected]>
ShahabT
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
## What changed? <!-- Describe what has changed in this PR --> Syncing TQ User Data for all types of a single TQ name at once to reduce the SetCurrent and SetRamping latency and flakiness of tests. ## Why? <!-- Tell your future self why have you made these changes --> ## How did you test it? <!-- How have you verified this change? Tested locally? Added a unit test? Checked in staging env? --> ## Potential risks <!-- Assuming the worst case, what can be broken when deploying this change to production? --> ## Documentation <!-- Have you made sure this change doesn't falsify anything currently stated in `docs/`? If significant new behavior is added, have you described that in `docs/`? --> ## Is hotfix candidate? <!-- Is this PR a hotfix candidate or does it require a notification to be sent to the broader community? (Yes/No) --> --------- Co-authored-by: Carly de Frondeville <[email protected]>
ShahabT
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
## What changed? <!-- Describe what has changed in this PR --> Syncing TQ User Data for all types of a single TQ name at once to reduce the SetCurrent and SetRamping latency and flakiness of tests. ## Why? <!-- Tell your future self why have you made these changes --> ## How did you test it? <!-- How have you verified this change? Tested locally? Added a unit test? Checked in staging env? --> ## Potential risks <!-- Assuming the worst case, what can be broken when deploying this change to production? --> ## Documentation <!-- Have you made sure this change doesn't falsify anything currently stated in `docs/`? If significant new behavior is added, have you described that in `docs/`? --> ## Is hotfix candidate? <!-- Is this PR a hotfix candidate or does it require a notification to be sent to the broader community? (Yes/No) --> --------- Co-authored-by: Carly de Frondeville <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed?
Syncing TQ User Data for all types of a single TQ name at once to reduce the SetCurrent and SetRamping latency and flakiness of tests.
Why?
How did you test it?
Potential risks
Documentation
Is hotfix candidate?