Skip to content

Conversation

@DaanDeMeyer
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #23481

@github-actions github-actions bot added the portable Anything to do with systemd-portable and portablectl and portables label May 23, 2022
@evverx
Copy link
Contributor

evverx commented May 23, 2022

@mrc0mmand I'm wondering why the CI didn't catch it? Is the portabled testsuite skipped on CentOS CI when the tests are run under ASan?

@mrc0mmand
Copy link
Member

@mrc0mmand I'm wondering why the CI didn't catch it? Is the portabled testsuite skipped on CentOS CI when the tests are run under ASan?

It is included in the ASan/UBSan list: https://github.com/systemd/systemd-centos-ci/blob/master/vagrant/test_scripts/test-arch-sanitizers-clang.sh#L110. Maybe the test itself doesn't exercise this code path?

@evverx
Copy link
Contributor

evverx commented May 23, 2022

It is included in the ASan/UBSan list

Got it. Thanks!

Maybe the test itself doesn't exercise this code path?

Looks like it.

@yuwata yuwata merged commit 794da5a into systemd:main May 24, 2022
@DaanDeMeyer DaanDeMeyer deleted the portablectl-memory-leak branch August 2, 2022 09:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

portable Anything to do with systemd-portable and portablectl and portables

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

There is a memory leak in portablectl

4 participants