-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: run build test with BPF-related stuff as well #21607
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
f08b5bf
to
1c9c492
Compare
1c9c492
to
876466c
Compare
bluca
reviewed
Dec 3, 2021
06a73d0
to
466e63a
Compare
It looks like it's working!
@bluca, @martinpitt thanks! |
bluca
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2021
evverx
added a commit
to evverx/systemd
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2021
afl-clang and hufzz-clang try to instrument the code and the underlying compilers don't like it. It should probably be fixed in both afl and honggfuzz eventually but until then let's just use "raw" clang to build bpf-skeletons. It's a follow-up to systemd#21607
mrc0mmand
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2021
afl-clang and hufzz-clang try to instrument the code and the underlying compilers don't like it. It should probably be fixed in both afl and honggfuzz eventually but until then let's just use "raw" clang to build bpf-skeletons. It's a follow-up to #21607
Yamakuzure
pushed a commit
to elogind/elogind
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2022
afl-clang and hufzz-clang try to instrument the code and the underlying compilers don't like it. It should probably be fixed in both afl and honggfuzz eventually but until then let's just use "raw" clang to build bpf-skeletons. It's a follow-up to systemd/systemd#21607
Yamakuzure
pushed a commit
to elogind/elogind
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2022
afl-clang and hufzz-clang try to instrument the code and the underlying compilers don't like it. It should probably be fixed in both afl and honggfuzz eventually but until then let's just use "raw" clang to build bpf-skeletons. It's a follow-up to systemd/systemd#21607
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
analyze
bpf
ci
good-to-merge/waiting-for-ci 👍
PR is good to merge, but CI hasn't passed at time of review. Please merge if you see CI has passed
meson
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.