Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: run build test with BPF-related stuff as well #21607

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 3, 2021

Conversation

mrc0mmand
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@mrc0mmand mrc0mmand force-pushed the ci-install-libbpf branch 2 times, most recently from f08b5bf to 1c9c492 Compare December 2, 2021 21:00
@mrc0mmand mrc0mmand added the meson label Dec 2, 2021
@mrc0mmand mrc0mmand marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2021 07:45
@mrc0mmand
Copy link
Member Author

It looks like it's working!

Run-time dependency libbpf found: YES 0.4.0
Program clang-13 found: YES (/usr/bin/clang-13)
Program /usr/lib/llvm-13/bin/llvm-strip found: YES (/usr/lib/llvm-13/bin/llvm-strip)
Program bpftool found: YES (/usr/sbin/bpftool)

@bluca, @martinpitt thanks!

@bluca bluca added the good-to-merge/waiting-for-ci 👍 PR is good to merge, but CI hasn't passed at time of review. Please merge if you see CI has passed label Dec 3, 2021
@bluca bluca merged commit 09dfd91 into systemd:main Dec 3, 2021
@mrc0mmand mrc0mmand deleted the ci-install-libbpf branch December 3, 2021 18:38
evverx added a commit to evverx/systemd that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2021
afl-clang and hufzz-clang try to instrument the code and the
underlying compilers don't like it. It should probably be
fixed in both afl and honggfuzz eventually but until then
let's just use "raw" clang to build bpf-skeletons.

It's a follow-up to systemd#21607
mrc0mmand pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2021
afl-clang and hufzz-clang try to instrument the code and the
underlying compilers don't like it. It should probably be
fixed in both afl and honggfuzz eventually but until then
let's just use "raw" clang to build bpf-skeletons.

It's a follow-up to #21607
Yamakuzure pushed a commit to elogind/elogind that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2022
afl-clang and hufzz-clang try to instrument the code and the
underlying compilers don't like it. It should probably be
fixed in both afl and honggfuzz eventually but until then
let's just use "raw" clang to build bpf-skeletons.

It's a follow-up to systemd/systemd#21607
Yamakuzure pushed a commit to elogind/elogind that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2022
afl-clang and hufzz-clang try to instrument the code and the
underlying compilers don't like it. It should probably be
fixed in both afl and honggfuzz eventually but until then
let's just use "raw" clang to build bpf-skeletons.

It's a follow-up to systemd/systemd#21607
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
analyze bpf ci good-to-merge/waiting-for-ci 👍 PR is good to merge, but CI hasn't passed at time of review. Please merge if you see CI has passed meson
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants