Skip to content

Conversation

@poettering
Copy link
Member

Let's link the three man pages together more tightly and explain what
the two targets are about, emphasizing local/quick/reliable/approximate
vs remote/slow/unreliable/accurate synchronization.

Follow-up for: 1431b2f fe934b4

@poettering
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @Minoru

@bluca bluca added documentation units good-to-merge/waiting-for-ci 👍 PR is good to merge, but CI hasn't passed at time of review. Please merge if you see CI has passed labels Dec 21, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@Minoru Minoru left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! This achieves the intent of my PR much more thoroughly than I could.

I left a few comments where I think the doc could be less abstruse or more precise — please see below.

@bluca bluca added good-to-merge/with-minor-suggestions and removed good-to-merge/waiting-for-ci 👍 PR is good to merge, but CI hasn't passed at time of review. Please merge if you see CI has passed labels Dec 21, 2020
poettering and others added 2 commits December 28, 2020 10:52
Let's link the three man pages together more tightly and explain what
the two targets are about, emphasizing local/quick/reliable/approximate
vs remote/slow/unreliable/accurate synchronization.

Follow-up for: 1431b2f fe934b4
@poettering
Copy link
Member Author

Force pushed a new version. Applied all of @Minoru's suggested changes (thanks!). No other changes. Since this all is documentation, and changes were relatively minor, taking liberty to upgrade green label.

Thanks!

@poettering poettering added good-to-merge/waiting-for-ci 👍 PR is good to merge, but CI hasn't passed at time of review. Please merge if you see CI has passed and removed good-to-merge/with-minor-suggestions labels Dec 28, 2020
@bluca
Copy link
Member

bluca commented Dec 28, 2020

Given it's manpages-only, no need to wait for the slow bionic-* CI suites, and the rest is green, so merging.

@bluca bluca merged commit d514454 into systemd:master Dec 28, 2020
@bluca bluca added documentation and removed good-to-merge/waiting-for-ci 👍 PR is good to merge, but CI hasn't passed at time of review. Please merge if you see CI has passed labels Dec 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants