Initial checklist
Problem
While one is used more by authors, historically there have been problems when using it across parsers, hence why the default is tab.
Solution
To illustrate, one:
1. asd
10. asdasd
100. asdasdasd
* asd
* asdasd
* asdasdasd
tab:
1. asd
10. asdasd
100. asdasdasd
* asd
* asdasd
* asdasdasd
Note that tab is more consistent. Especially around the 1st and 10th mark of incrementally numbered items. And the 100th, 1kth, 10kth items. Whereas one will always be staggered. It’s probably most common to have lists between 1-99 items, hence I deem that most important.
This is mostly noticeable when trying to indent further lines: they have to match the items “bullet” \d+[\.)]\ {1,4}.
Still, one seems to be used more? So probably good to switch the default output format to that?
Alternatives
stay as is
Initial checklist
Problem
While
oneis used more by authors, historically there have been problems when using it across parsers, hence why the default istab.Solution
To illustrate,
one:tab:Note that
tabis more consistent. Especially around the 1st and 10th mark of incrementally numbered items. And the 100th, 1kth, 10kth items. Whereasonewill always be staggered. It’s probably most common to have lists between 1-99 items, hence I deem that most important.This is mostly noticeable when trying to indent further lines: they have to match the items “bullet”
\d+[\.)]\ {1,4}.Still,
oneseems to be used more? So probably good to switch the default output format to that?Alternatives
stay as is