[Form] Update UPGRADE-2.3.md to account for #9388 #9804
Conversation
Although the output was fine the .md file wasn't.
UPGRADE-2.3.md
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Although was already used at the beginning paragraph of the file so I wanted to spice up the wording. Maybe "While" would be o.k. too?
The fact that not setting the `data` option doesn't lock the form can be taken out of the description which states that *if* the `data` option is set the data will be locked automatically (so the opposite must be happening if it isn't).
UPGRADE-2.3.md
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The other way is to omit the data option entirely when you don't have a default data
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I had that in there in the first place (ureimers@1c74898) but Luis mentioned that it would be better to be explicit and I agreed so I removed that alternative. I honestly starting to don't know which way is the best here and if I should show them both.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What users want to accomplish is set a value that is always used if there is no data bound and never used if there is.
In other words: They want to implement a default_value option.
Before 2.3.7 they where able to accomplish that with the above mentioned code under Before:.
So to be able to do that >=2.3.7 they need to change their code like I mentioned in After:.
I think as a guideline to how to accomplish something in 2.3 you where able to do prior 2.3 this should suffice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
IMO, omitting the data option is a better implementation than passing the data option and then modifying the builder to tell it to ignore it
|
Sent PR ureimers#1 to update the wording and before/after example. |
[Form] Fixed wording in the UPGRADE file
This PR was submitted for the 2.3-dev branch but it was merged into the 2.3 branch instead (closes #9804). Discussion ---------- [Form] Update UPGRADE-2.3.md to account for #9388 Added documentation for how to correctly pre-fill a form using the form's `data` option. The "old" and also wrong way of doing it broke with Symfony 2.3.7 (with #9388 to be precise) and this short documentation should help others to fix the problem and do it right. Commits ------- 5e06535 [Form] Update UPGRADE-2.3.md to account for #9388
5 participants
Added documentation for how to correctly pre-fill a form using the form's
dataoption.The "old" and also wrong way of doing it broke with Symfony 2.3.7 (with #9388 to be precise) and this short documentation should help others to fix the problem and do it right.