About plus:

Shouldn't we do the same for stubs?

Maybe. I made change for Java code generation, because lack of incrementalism trigger all test recompilation each build - and compilation is costly.

Going back to stubs: do you mean both goals convert and generateStubs should be incremental? Regardless their cost, it would be elegant to have incrementalism implemented for both. I already implemented that, so if you confirm both goals should be modified, I will update PR.

BTW, do you prefer single commit PR or multiple commits (and you will stash them on your side)

Can you please add some tests?

Well, PR is non-functional change, so existing tests should be enough

Going back to stubs: do you mean both goals convert and generateStubs should be incremental? Regardless their cost, it would be elegant to have incrementalism implemented for both. I already implemented that, so if you confirm both goals should be modified, I will update PR.

Correct, thanks a lot.

BTW, do you prefer single commit PR or multiple commits (and you will stash them on your side)

Do however you please, I'll stash them upon merge.

Well, PR is non-functional change, so existing tests should be enough

👍

Great work @michaldo , thanks a lot!