Skip to content

Upgrade to Scio 0.14.0#696

Merged
monzalo14 merged 6 commits into
masterfrom
scio-0.14.0
Feb 1, 2024
Merged

Upgrade to Scio 0.14.0#696
monzalo14 merged 6 commits into
masterfrom
scio-0.14.0

Conversation

@clairemcginty

@clairemcginty clairemcginty commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scio 0.14.0 upgrade

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jan 25, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (ae43f56) 71.24% compared to head (b254368) 71.32%.

Files Patch % Lines
...in/scala/com/spotify/ratatool/diffy/BigDiffy.scala 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #696      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.24%   71.32%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          40       40              
  Lines        1749     1747       -2     
  Branches      259      247      -12     
==========================================
  Hits         1246     1246              
+ Misses        503      501       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
ratatoolCli 3.00% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
ratatoolCommon ?
ratatoolDiffy 31.46% <20.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
ratatoolExamples 15.99% <0.00%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
ratatoolSampling 62.38% <100.00%> (+0.11%) ⬆️
ratatoolScalacheck 81.71% <ø> (ø)
ratatoolShapeless 4.32% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Comment thread build.sbt Outdated
Comment on lines +161 to +162
"com.google.guava" % "guava" % guavaVersion,
"org.apache.beam" % "beam-vendor-guava-32_1_2-jre" % beamVendorVersion,

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think common should depend on beam. It is fine to use non shaded guava IMHO

@clairemcginty
clairemcginty marked this pull request as ready for review February 1, 2024 13:42
@clairemcginty clairemcginty changed the title [DRAFT] Upgrade to Scio 0.14.0 Upgrade to Scio 0.14.0 Feb 1, 2024
@monzalo14

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for the update @clairemcginty @RustedBones!

@monzalo14
monzalo14 merged commit 1fc2c7c into master Feb 1, 2024
@RustedBones
RustedBones deleted the scio-0.14.0 branch February 5, 2024 08:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants