Skip to content

Split the spglib.spglib monolith into individual submodules#620

Merged
lan496 merged 8 commits intospglib:developfrom
LecrisUT:chore/split_more_source
Nov 21, 2025
Merged

Split the spglib.spglib monolith into individual submodules#620
lan496 merged 8 commits intospglib:developfrom
LecrisUT:chore/split_more_source

Conversation

@LecrisUT
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Depends on #619

@LecrisUT LecrisUT added this to the 2.7 milestone Nov 17, 2025
@LecrisUT LecrisUT requested a review from lan496 November 17, 2025 23:18
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.05%. Comparing base (170ff8c) to head (d1962a5).
⚠️ Report is 31 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #620   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    74.05%   74.05%           
========================================
  Files           27       27           
  Lines         8018     8018           
  Branches      1643     1643           
========================================
  Hits          5938     5938           
  Misses        1603     1603           
  Partials       477      477           
Flag Coverage Δ
c_api 69.45% <ø> (ø)
fortran_api 52.96% <ø> (ø)
python_api 67.18% <ø> (ø)
unit_tests 11.68% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@lan496
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

lan496 commented Nov 19, 2025

@LecrisUT, can you resolve conflicts with upstream?

@LecrisUT
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@lan496 Do you think you could review and get this one in before #579? There would be some non-trivial rebase to make both of these compatible, and I am thinking it would be easier to do it on top of this one rather than vice-versa

@lan496
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

lan496 commented Nov 20, 2025

Oops, I've merged #579 before reading your comment. Should I revert #579 ?

@LecrisUT
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Nah it's ok. It's more work to rebase, but it's not too bad

@LecrisUT LecrisUT force-pushed the chore/split_more_source branch from f0e916f to d1962a5 Compare November 20, 2025 15:01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@atztogo atztogo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Beautiful.

@lan496 lan496 merged commit f1aa09c into spglib:develop Nov 21, 2025
50 checks passed
@LecrisUT LecrisUT deleted the chore/split_more_source branch November 21, 2025 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants